Abstract

The public history of transgender life in mainland China has a striking documentary geography. Beijing holds clusters created by specialist medicine, national surveys, community organizations, hotlines, and policy research. Shanghai holds clusters created by queer urban culture, ShanghaiPRIDE, the long public archive surrounding Jin Xing, and research on transgender women’s labor and livelihood. Guiyang entered national rights history through the layered arbitration, litigation, media, and advocacy record of Mr. C’s employment dispute. Nanjing, Suzhou, and the wider Jiangsu region appear through public-health and qualitative research with transgender women. Shenyang became a recurring site in studies of transgender women’s mental health, HIV-related services, and service use. Digital archives, nationwide surveys, and intercity organizational networks later connected these local records to national systems of retrieval and citation (Bao 2011, 2015, 2018; Guo 2018; Yang 2019; Yan et al. 2019; She et al. 2022).

This entry proposes evidence geography as a research framework. The framework asks why a city produces particular kinds of transgender historical evidence and how those records travel beyond their place of origin. Its central thesis is that urban density in the surviving public record primarily reflects the spatial distribution of record-producing capacity. Large hospitals, research teams, community organizations, court cases, media centers, public events, and preservation projects raise the documentary density of particular places. Nationwide surveys and networked platforms then recombine institutional location, participant geography, and publication geography.

Two tools organize the analysis. An evidence-geography matrix records place, institution, source_regime, event_time, record_time, sample_origin, publication_origin, scope, reuse_route, and archive_route. A city-interface ledger follows lived event → urban institution → record production → intercity circulation → national citation → digital rediscovery. Together they convert place names from background detail into source-critical fields and make the differences among Beijing, Shanghai, Guiyang, Jiangsu, and Shenyang into researchable historical questions.

Keywords: transgender history; mainland China; evidence geography; urban history; Beijing; Shanghai; Guiyang; Jiangsu; Shenyang; archives

1. Research question: why do the same city names recur in transgender historical sources?

A reader moving through mainland Chinese transgender history soon encounters a recurring set of place names. Beijing is associated with Peking University Third Hospital, the Beijing LGBT Center, the 2017 national transgender survey, and national-level policy research. Shanghai is associated with Jin Xing, ShanghaiPRIDE, queer urban spaces, and the Beijing–Shanghai survey of transgender women sex workers. Guiyang is associated with Mr. C’s employment dispute. Nanjing and Suzhou are associated with qualitative research on transgender women. Shenyang appears in a sequence of studies on transgender women’s mental health and service use. Hangzhou, Chengdu, Qingdao, and other cities enter individual chains through employment disputes, media events, and medical histories (Asia Catalyst 2015; Beijing LGBT Center & Department of Sociology, Peking University 2017; Tongyu 2018; Yan et al. 2019).

A place name can carry three separate meanings. The first is event location: the place where employment, medical care, organizing, or public programming occurred. The second is record-production location: the city where a hospital, court, research team, community organization, or media institution generated the source. The third is circulation location: the national or networked venue through which local material reached a wider audience. These layers often overlap, and they also separate. A nationwide online survey can be organized by Beijing institutions, recruit participants across many provinces, and later circulate through global academic databases and community archives.

This entry asks: How do high-density urban nodes form in mainland China’s transgender public history, and how can researchers use those nodes while preserving the distance between national claims and local documentary silences?

The answer lies in recording interfaces. Hospitals produce clinical and institutional histories. Community organizations produce service and survey records. Courts produce dispute files. Media and cultural events produce public narratives. Universities and public-health networks produce research samples. Digital platforms transform locally generated material into cross-regional discovery routes (Hildebrandt 2013; Bao 2018; Liu 2023). Research on LGBT activism, legal mobilization, and visibility in China further shows how organizational space, legal opportunity, censorship, and low-visibility activism shape the public record (Chua 2019; Wang 2021, 2026; Bernot, Yang & Davies 2025). Evidence geography maps these interfaces so that every city shows both what happened and who placed the event into the public record.

2. Materials and method: the evidence-geography matrix and city-interface ledger

The analysis draws on four source families. The first consists of books, peer-reviewed articles, dissertations, and reviews in transgender studies and Chinese queer studies, with particular attention to urban space, community organization, legal mobilization, medicine, mental health, labor, public health, and digital practice (Chiang 2018, 2021; Engebretsen, Schroeder & Bao 2015; Bao 2011, 2018; Guo 2018; Yang 2019; Fappani 2024; Lin et al. 2021; Liu 2023). The second consists of hospital pages, public-security and health regulations, court materials, international-organization reports, and nationwide surveys that define institutional interfaces and formal scope (Ministry of Public Security Third Bureau 2002; Ministry of Health 2009; UNDP 2014, 2016, 2018; National Health Commission 2022).

The third family contains community, event, and service records, including material from the Beijing LGBT Center, the National Transgender Hotline, ShanghaiPRIDE, and Tongyu. These sources show how services, events, advocacy, and interpretations of litigation circulated across cities (China Development Brief 2018; ShanghaiPRIDE 2018; Tongyu 2018, 2020). The fourth family contains contemporaneous news and digital archives that preserve people, disputes, urban events, and rediscovery routes for migrated pages (China News Service 2011, 2016; The Paper 2016; Project Trans 2026; Transgender and Gender-Diverse Archive 2026).

The evidence-geography matrix records ten fields:

  1. place: where an event occurred, participants were recruited, or a service operated;
  2. institution: hospital, court, research team, community organization, media outlet, or platform;
  3. source_regime: clinical, administrative, survey, judicial, community, media, or archival;
  4. event_time: when the event occurred;
  5. record_time: when the source was created;
  6. sample_origin: where participants or cases came from;
  7. publication_origin: which institution or city released the record;
  8. scope: single city, multiple cities, regional, or national;
  9. reuse_route: later research, advocacy, or policy uses;
  10. archive_route: the stable discovery route available today.

The city-interface ledger follows a second chain: lived event → urban institution → record production → intercity circulation → national citation → digital rediscovery. The Mr. C dispute illustrates the method. A short employment relationship in Guiyang entered arbitration and litigation; national news, Tongyu’s advocacy archive, and academic legal scholarship then carried the case into a much broader history of transgender employment rights (Yang 2019; Tongyu 2018, 2020). The ledger preserves the recorder and purpose at every transition.

3. Beijing: a high-density node built through overlapping institutional interfaces

Beijing’s documentary density comes from several institutional systems operating in the same city. The plastic-surgery history of Peking University Third Hospital preserves an institutional memory of gender-reassignment medicine, while its multidisciplinary transgender clinic created a durable public interface for later care. National health-technology rules and public-security rules on household-registration gender markers were issued by central agencies, which gives Beijing a dual role in many research routes: it is both the location of major medical institutions and a publication center for national policy (Peking University Third Hospital 2012, 2018; Ministry of Public Security Third Bureau 2002; Ministry of Health 2009; National Health Commission 2022).

Community organization added a second documentary layer. The Beijing LGBT Center developed from community programming and psychological support into transgender services, survey collaboration, and hotline infrastructure. Its 2017 survey with the Department of Sociology at Peking University became a repeatedly cited source for later research on family relations, schooling, health care, mental health, and employment (Guo 2018; Beijing LGBT Center & Department of Sociology, Peking University 2017). The National Transgender Hotline linked Beijing-based organizations with Trans Center, Anhui groups, youth organizers, and volunteers, turning a city-based institutional network into a national service interface (China Development Brief 2018).

Beijing therefore exemplifies interface stacking. Hospitals generate medical records and institutional histories; community organizations generate service and survey records; universities create research collaborations; central agencies issue national rules; national media and networked platforms amplify circulation. A citation described as “Beijing evidence” can refer to a local experience, a national sample organized by Beijing institutions, or a national rule released from Beijing. Keeping those categories separate changes the scale of the claim.

Asia Catalyst’s 2015 study of transgender women sex workers in Beijing and Shanghai offers a particularly clear example. The study interviewed seventy people, thirty-five in each city, through service relationships involving the Beijing Zuoyou Information Center and the Shanghai CSW&MSM Center (Asia Catalyst 2015). The record demonstrates that urban service networks create recruitment capacity. It also shows that the denominator belongs to the population reached through those networks. High documentary density and organizational infrastructure are directly linked in this case.

4. Shanghai: public culture, urban space, event archives, and livelihood research

Shanghai produces a different documentary combination. Hongwei Bao’s work on queer space and postsocialist queer culture places bars, events, consumption spaces, media, and cultural production inside an urban-visibility framework. The career of Jin Xing, spanning dance, television, interviews, and public controversy, created a long-running personal archive within the city’s cultural economy (Bao 2011, 2018; China News Service 2011). These sources foreground public culture and media rather than the hospital-policy-community combination that gives Beijing much of its documentary density.

ShanghaiPRIDE created a second route. Its programming from 2009 through 2020 generated pages for talks, films, community collaborations, and transgender-specific activity, including the 2018 Trans Pride interface. GenderLibs has reconstructed this corpus in the annotated archive guide to transgender public programming at ShanghaiPRIDE. Evidence geography adds a spatial question: how did an event infrastructure produce a class of public-cultural record with dates, program themes, partner organizations, and participation formats (ShanghaiPRIDE 2018)?

Shanghai also joins Beijing in research on transgender women’s sex work. Asia Catalyst’s two-city study used local service organizations to recruit participants and documented migration, livelihood, encounters with public services, policing, and health care (Asia Catalyst 2015). Tsang’s later research on intimate-partner violence and sisterhood among transgender women sex workers brought labor and relationship networks into academic analysis (Tsang 2020). In these sources, “Shanghai” can mean a cultural-event city, a service-network city, a labor setting, and a research recruitment site.

This mixture reveals urban functional differentiation. The same city can generate highly public cultural visibility and deeply marginalized labor evidence. Each form is recorded by a different institutional interface and enters a different archive. Putting them together shifts the historical question from “who is most visible?” to “which interfaces of life became repeatedly documented?”

5. Guiyang: how one procedurally extended dispute placed a regional city in national rights history

Guiyang’s prominence in transgender public history is closely tied to a single employment dispute with a long procedural life. In 2015, Mr. C entered a sales position at a local health-check company. The end of that employment relationship led to arbitration, labor litigation, and later disputes involving personality rights and equal employment. Reports and advocacy records from 2016 through 2018 preserved questions about clothing, gender expression, dismissal, compensation, and discrimination language (China News Service 2016; The Paper 2016; Tongyu 2018).

Chengming Yang later placed the case inside a discussion of international labor equality and Chinese law, carrying a Guiyang dispute into English-language legal scholarship (Yang 2019). Tongyu’s 2020 archive of impact litigation preserved the later significance of “gender identity and gender expression” in judicial reasoning (Tongyu 2020). Event location, judicial institutions, media circulation, advocacy interpretation, and academic reuse therefore form a continuous transformation chain.

Guiyang illustrates an event-triggered high-density node. A city can enter public history through a procedurally extended case even when its institutional landscape differs from Beijing’s national organizations and Shanghai’s recurring public events. Arbitration, filing, judgments, appeals, and later interpretation each create another citable point. The frequency of a place name in historical sources therefore reflects procedural duration as well as institutional concentration.

The evidentiary task remains specific. Guiyang sources provide unusually rich material for reconstructing one employment relationship and the formation of rights language. Nationwide surveys and multi-site studies provide evidence about distributions and recurring experiences across larger populations. The matrix allows those source types to complement one another while retaining their distinct scales.

6. Jiangsu and Shenyang: research networks as urban record-producing infrastructure

Nanjing, Suzhou, and the wider Jiangsu region often enter transgender public history through research samples. Yan and colleagues’ 2019 qualitative study recruited transgender women in Nanjing and Suzhou and examined identity, stigma, and HIV risk (Yan et al. 2019). The study connects local community networks, public-health recruitment, and first-person accounts. Here the city is both a field site and a setting for service contact and social relationships.

Shenyang forms a second research-centered cluster. Studies of transgender women in the city linked anxiety, discrimination, social support, HIV-related conditions, and later mental-health service utilization among transgender women sex workers (Lin et al. 2021; She et al. 2022). GenderLibs has already organized these studies by research design in its history of transgender mental-health evidence in mainland China. Evidence geography highlights a separate fact: repeated appearance of a city in academic literature often signals durable research teams, partner institutions, public-health projects, and recruitment networks.

These research-network nodes have a different structure from Guiyang’s litigation node. Their density grows through serial sampling, collaboration, and professional networks. Once published, city names enter systematic reviews and later research design, giving local samples a second layer of national and international visibility (Lin et al. 2021). Researchers can preserve both geography and inferential scope by writing “in a Shenyang sample” or “among participants recruited in Nanjing and Suzhou” when the study design supports that level.

Jiangsu and Shenyang also reveal the practical geography of research. Teams work through accessible community networks, health systems, and partner organizations; participants move along employment, education, medical, and social ties. Research geography is therefore both a map of institutional collaboration and a map of mobility. Future comparative work can treat recruitment method, residence duration, household-registration origin, work location, and service-use location as separate variables.

7. Nationwide surveys and digital platforms: compressing and expanding geography

The 2016 UNDP national LGBTI survey and the 2017 national transgender survey shifted the evidence scale toward nationwide collection. Online recruitment, organizational partnerships, and cross-regional circulation gathered participants and converted experiences of family, education, health care, employment, and social attitudes into comparable variables (UNDP 2014, 2016, 2018; Beijing LGBT Center & Department of Sociology, Peking University 2017). Later national research brought public attitudes, adolescent bullying, employment experience, and mental-health mechanisms into larger samples, adding comparison interfaces between city studies and nationwide denominators (Peng et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2020; Suen, Chan & Badgett 2020; Spielmann et al. 2022). National scale brings its own geographical questions: participant distribution, recruitment-channel distribution, and institutional location remain separate coordinates.

Digital platforms change the map again. Liu’s study of Chinese transgender people’s digital gender practices shows how platforms support first-person presentation, gender practice, and community connection across urban boundaries (Liu 2023). Digital archives reorganize government documents, news, community records, and scholarship into thematic discovery routes. Project Trans’s legal index, the Transgender and Gender-Diverse Archive, and Project Polymorph’s Sinophone transgender chronology allow readers to begin with a topic and then recover the original institution and location (Project Trans 2026; Transgender and Gender-Diverse Archive 2026; Project Polymorph 2026). Legal databases perform a similar re-indexing function: the Dangdang labor dispute entered Cornell’s Gender Justice collection, giving a Beijing workplace event a cross-language discovery route (Cornell Legal Information Institute 2020).

This process can be called geographical re-indexing. The original event retains a location while the discovery layer reorganizes sources by topic, period, institution, or keyword. A reader may search an archive for transgender employment and arrive at the Guiyang case. Another may begin with legal gender recognition and reach a 2002 national public-security document before following its later local applications. Digital discovery gives thematic ordering greater weight and makes source relationships more important.

Nationwide surveys and digital archives therefore form a second layer of evidence geography. The first layer asks where records were generated. The second asks how records were aggregated and rediscovered. Taken together, they show the complete route through which local nodes enter national historical narratives.

8. Mobility: another spatial layer between the city of record and the geography of a life

Urban documentary density also interacts with migration. Asia Catalyst’s Beijing–Shanghai study recorded that many participants had moved away from their places of origin before living and working in major cities. Its analysis connected migration with work, sex work, public services, health care, and family relations (Asia Catalyst 2015). Amnesty International’s research on gender-affirming care similarly documented cross-regional searches for medical information, services, and support (Amnesty International 2019).

A “Beijing sample” or “Shanghai sample” can therefore contain people whose birthplaces, upbringing, household registration, and family networks lie across many regions. The city may represent current work and service contact, while the life history spans several places. The evidence-geography matrix separates sample_origin from place so that migration becomes part of the explanation. Spatial concentration of medicine, employment, education, and community resources shapes movement; movement in turn shapes family ties, document use, and access to services.

This layer works especially well beside GenderLibs’ five-layer guide to transgender education identity records and history of transgender employment evidence. Student records, identity documents, employment relations, and medical materials travel across cities with the individual. Each database or institution may update at a different time. A transgender employment case from Hangzhou also entered national media and rights discussion, showing how a local labor experience can acquire intercity circulation (Radio Free Asia 2019). Adding mobility to the ledger turns local administrative experiences into continuous intercity record chains.

9. Counterevidence and competing explanations: several mechanisms produce documentary density

A first competing explanation is population scale. Beijing and Shanghai are megacities that attract large-scale migration, so more people and more institutional contact can generate more records. Population scale is an important background variable. Evidence geography adds the record-production mechanism: large cities still differ in the kinds of transgender sources that survive, and those differences correspond to hospitals, research teams, community organizations, litigation, media production, and event infrastructure.

A second explanation is preservation and search bias. Large institutional websites, national media, academic journals, and sources selected for community archiving enjoy stronger survival and discovery routes. Local groups, early forums, personal pages, and short-lived event pages have weaker preservation pathways (Transgender and Gender-Diverse Archive 2026). The density visible today therefore includes historical activity and the technical history of web survival.

A third explanation is research recruitment. Public-health and mental-health studies often grow from stable collaboration with community or service networks. Nationwide online surveys also depend on organizational dissemination and digital reach. A city that appears repeatedly in papers may possess a mature research interface. Research teams, community partners, and participants jointly shape the geography of the sample (Lin et al. 2021; Yan et al. 2019).

A fourth explanation is proceduralization. Litigation, surveys, medical rules, and large public events create dated sequences and formal records. Everyday family negotiation, ordinary workplace experience, local mutual aid, and short-lived platform interaction leave different documentary traces. The public-history map is therefore a map of recording opportunity. It shows where current evidence was produced and points toward places and interfaces where source density remains thin.

10. How to use the evidence-geography matrix

A city-level project can begin with four columns: event place / recording institution / source type / current discovery route. A Beijing medical-history row might read “Beijing / Peking University Third Hospital / institutional and clinical record / hospital page or paper.” A Guiyang employment-history row might read “Guiyang / arbitration and courts / judicial and news record / media, Tongyu archive, and scholarship.” A Shanghai event-history row might read “Shanghai / ShanghaiPRIDE / event archive / surviving page and web archive.”

The second step adds time. Record event time and record-production time separately. An institution may publish a retrospective decades after the original event, and a digital archive may preserve that page much later. Three dates—event, record, and preservation—allow researchers to separate historical occurrence, institutional memory, and rediscovery.

The third step adds scale: individual, single-city sample, two-city sample, nationwide online sample, or national policy. Scale determines citation grammar. A single-city study supports observations about its recruited sample; a national survey supports cross-regional comparisons among survey participants; a national rule supports claims about the formal institutional standard. Explicit scale makes the sources complementary.

The fourth step adds the reuse route. Each time a local source enters academic scholarship, national advocacy, policy discussion, a digital archive, or a GenderLibs research article, record a reuse_route. This field shows how a local event gradually acquires national historical significance.

11. Original synthesis: urban evidence ecologies and visibility conversion

The matrix reveals five recurring evidence ecologies. Beijing represents an institution-stacking ecology, where hospitals, universities, community organizations, central agencies, and national surveys connect. Shanghai represents a public-culture and event ecology, where cultural figures, urban spaces, event networks, and livelihood research coexist. Guiyang represents a procedural-event ecology, where a single case generates records across successive legal stages. Jiangsu and Shenyang represent research-network ecologies, where serial studies and professional collaboration carry urban samples into academic citation. Digital archives represent a networked re-indexing ecology, crossing physical cities and reorganizing geographically dispersed sources as thematic entry points.

These five forms constitute the article’s original synthesis, urban evidence ecology. The concept describes how cities produce different kinds of public history through institutions, events, research, and preservation capacity. Ecologies can transform into one another. A local case reaches an intercity knowledge network through national news and scholarship. A city sample enters national evidence through a systematic review. An event page gains a longer life through digital preservation. A national rule creates new implementation records in local hospitals, schools, workplaces, and administrative systems.

The second synthesis is visibility conversion. Public visibility moves along local experience → institutional record → media/research circulation → national interpretation → digital preservation. Every stage changes the audience and the questions a source can answer. Following that chain in reverse allows a researcher to move from today’s search result back to the urban institution, original event, and actual denominator.

The framework also creates a concrete research agenda: add more cities, add more institutional types, recover local newspapers and hospital archives, preserve short-lived community pages, build intercity oral-history projects, and separate research location from participants’ earlier places of life. Existing high-density nodes become starting points. Every newly recovered local corpus can change the spatial shape of mainland China’s transgender public history.

Conclusion

Mainland China’s transgender public history has a distinct spatial structure. Beijing, Shanghai, Guiyang, Jiangsu, and Shenyang recur in surviving sources because they represent different mechanisms of record production: institutional stacking, public culture and events, judicial procedure, and research networks. Nationwide surveys and digital archives then reconnect these local records. A city name is therefore an evidentiary field. It can describe where an event occurred, where a record was produced, where a sample was recruited, where a source circulated, and where it was preserved.

The evidence-geography matrix and city-interface ledger offer an expandable method. Researchers first mark place, institution, source regime, sample, and scale, and then trace how the record circulates across cities, enters national scholarship, and reaches digital archives. High-visibility cities become record-production nodes, while geographical silences become priorities for source discovery.

This approach gives a historical map two jobs: it displays clusters that can already be reconstructed and identifies areas where evidence remains sparse. As local hospital archives, city-level community histories, personal collections, oral histories, and digital preservation projects enter the public record, the evidence geography of transgender history in mainland China will gain new nodes and new connections.

References

  1. Bao, Hongwei. 2011. “Queering/Querying Cosmopolitanism: Queer Spaces in Shanghai.” Culture Unbound. https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/download/1994/1362
  2. Bao, Hongwei. 2015. “Digital Video Activism: Narrating History and Memory in Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China.” In Queer/Tongzhi China. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1105849/
  3. Bao, Hongwei. 2018. Queer Comrades: Gay Identity and Tongzhi Activism in Postsocialist China. NIAS Press. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1480891/queer-comrades-gay-identity-and-tongzhi-activism-in-postsocialist-china
  4. Bernot, Ausma, Fan Yang, and Sara E. Davies. 2025. “‘The Glowing Fireflies’: Invisible Activism under China’s Queer Necropolitics.” Convergence 31(3): 990–1008. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13548565241288466
  5. Chiang, Howard. 2018. After Eunuchs: Science, Medicine, and the Transformation of Sex in Modern China. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/after-eunuchs/9780231546331/
  6. Chiang, Howard. 2021. Transtopia in the Sinophone Pacific. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/transtopia-in-the-sinophone-pacific/9780231190961/
  7. Chua, Lynette J. 2019. “Legal Mobilization and Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 355–376. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-043026
  8. Engebretsen, Elisabeth L., William F. Schroeder, and Hongwei Bao, eds. 2015. Queer/Tongzhi China: New Perspectives on Research, Activism and Media Cultures. NIAS Press. https://cnlgbtdata.com/files/uploads/2024/06/Queer_Tongzhi_China.pdf
  9. Fappani, Valentina. 2024. “The Protection of Transgender Workers in China: Between Law and Society.” Rivista di Diritto dell’Asia Orientale. https://edizionicafoscari.it/media/pdf/article/rivista-di-diritto-dellasia-orientale/2024/1/art-10.30687-RIDAO-4713-223X-2024-01-003.pdf
  10. Guo, Lifu. 2018. “Tongzhi Solidarity under Chinese Authoritarian Government: A Case Study of the Beijing Tongzhi Center.” https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/49786/
  11. Hildebrandt, Timothy. 2013. Social Organizations and the Authoritarian State in China. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-organizations-and-the-authoritarian-state-in-china/FB004059F8F20232B87F9CDC854AD31D
  12. Lin, Yezhe, et al. 2021. “The Mental Health of Transgender and Gender Non-conforming People in China: A Systematic Review.” The Lancet Public Health 6(12): e954–e969. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34838199/
  13. Liu, Sha. 2023. Performative Authenticity: Chinese Transgender People’s Digital Gender Practices. PhD thesis, London School of Economics. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/4608/
  14. Liu, Yunsheng, and Zhaojun Wu. 2018. “性别选择权：性质界定与法权塑造.” 东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）. https://digital.transchinese.org/学术文献/法律/性别选择权性质界定与法权塑造.pdf
  15. Peng, K., et al. 2019. “Self-reported Rates of Abuse, Neglect, and Bullying Experienced by Transgender and Gender-Nonbinary Adolescents in China.” JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11058
  16. She, et al. 2022. “Mental Health Service Utilisation among Transgender Women Sex Workers Who Are at Risk of Mental Health Problems in Shenyang, China.” Health & Social Care in the Community. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hsc.13501
  17. Spielmann, Julia, et al. 2022. “Mental Health Contributors Among Transgender People in a Non-WEIRD Society: Evidence From China.” Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506211039388
  18. Suen, Yiu Tung, Randolph C. H. Chan, and M. V. Lee Badgett. 2020. “The Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minorities in Employment: Evidence from a Large-scale Survey of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex People in China.” The China Quarterly. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/china-quarterly/article/abs/experiences-of-sexual-and-gender-minorities-in-employment-evidence-from-a-largescale-survey-of-lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender-and-intersex-people-in-china/44E502F55680C6C50DDACB3BDA5F700B
  19. Tsang, Eileen Yuk-ha. 2020. “A Sisterhood of Hope: How China’s Transgender Sex Workers Cope with Intimate Partner Violence.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(21): 7959. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7672577/
  20. Wang, Stephanie Yingyi. 2021. “Unfinished Revolution: An Overview of Three Decades of LGBT Activism in China.” Made in China Journal. https://doi.org/10.22459/mic.06.01.2021.11
  21. Wang, Stephanie Yingyi. 2026. “Decolonizing Politics of (In)visibility and LGBT Rights—Being Queer/Tongzhi in China’s ‘New Normal’.” Sexualities. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13634607261417775
  22. Wang, Yuanyuan, et al. 2020. “Mapping out a Spectrum of the Chinese Public’s Discrimination toward the LGBT Community: Results from a National Survey.” BMC Public Health. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32397988/
  23. Yan, Zi-Han, et al. 2019. “Identity, Stigma, and HIV Risk among Transgender Women: A Qualitative Study in Jiangsu Province, China.” Infectious Diseases of Poverty. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0606-9
  24. Yang, Chengming. 2019. “The Implementation of International Law on the Equal Right of Labor of Transgender Minorities in China: Revisiting the Mr. C. Case.” Chinese Journal of International Law 18(1): 179–192. https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article-abstract/18/1/179/5479576
  25. Amnesty International. 2019. China: “I Need My Parents’ Consent to Be Myself”: Barriers to Gender-Affirming Treatments for Transgender People in China. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/0269/2019/en/
  26. Asia Catalyst. 2015. “My Life Is Too Dark to See the Light”: A Survey of the Living Conditions of Transgender Female Sex Workers in Beijing and Shanghai. https://asiacatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Asia-Catalyst-TG-SW-Report.pdf
  27. Beijing LGBT Center & Department of Sociology, Peking University. 2017. 2017中国跨性别群体生存现状调查报告：跨性别者与非性别常规者. https://cnlgbtdata.com/doc/43/
  28. Peking University Third Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery. 2012. “60年专题.” https://www.sar.com.cn/zt60/
  29. Peking University Third Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery. 2018. “易性症综合治疗门诊.” https://www.puh3.net.cn/zxwk/info/1005/1041.htm
  30. Ministry of Public Security Third Bureau. 2002. “关于公民实施变性手术后变更户口登记性别项目有关问题的批复（公治〔2002〕131号）.” https://project-trans.org/china-legal/spec/2002-09-04/mps-2002-131/
  31. Ministry of Health. 2009. “关于印发《变性手术技术管理规范（试行）》的通知（卫办医政发〔2009〕185号）.” https://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/gfxwj/200911/6341a0f92cad4f09acfae1e5d5b56477.shtml
  32. National Health Commission. 2022. “国家限制类技术目录和临床应用管理规范（2022年版）.” https://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/c100068/202204/2655831f6f444b00b3e50604e67531f5.shtml
  33. UNDP. 2014. Being LGBT in Asia: China Country Report. https://www.undp.org/china/publications/being-lgbt-asia-china-country-report
  34. UNDP. 2016. Being LGBTI in China: A National Survey on Social Attitudes towards Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Gender Expression. https://www.undp.org/china/publications/being-lgbti-china
  35. UNDP. 2018. Legal Gender Recognition in China: A Legal and Policy Review. https://www.undp.org/china/publications/legal-gender-recognition-china-legal-and-policy-review
  36. China Development Brief. 2018. “National transgender hotline launched in China.” https://chinadevelopmentbrief.org/reports/news/national-transgender-hotline-launched-in-china/
  37. China Development Brief. 2026. “Beijing LGBT Center.” https://chinadevelopmentbrief.org/ngos/beijing-lgbt-center/
  38. ShanghaiPRIDE. 2018. “骄傲节支持：2018年跨儿公益组织.” https://shpride.com/beneficiaries2018/
  39. China News Service. 2011. “金星谈变性：感谢老天给我身材，给我做女人的条件.” https://www.chinanews.com.cn/yl/2011/10-14/3388986.shtml
  40. China News Service. 2016. “‘女扮男装’员工被开除 当事人申请仲裁已获立案.” https://www.chinanews.com.cn/m/sh/2016/03-16/7799284.shtml
  41. The Paper. 2016. “贵阳跨性别就业歧视案开庭，公司辩称辞退该员工因不穿工装.” https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1454923
  42. Tongyu. 2018. “中国法院首表态：单位看不惯员工性别表达？歧视！” https://commonlanguage.github.io/TYarchives2018/20180205_1%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E9%A6%96%E8%A1%A8%E6%80%81%EF%BC%9A%E5%8D%95%E4%BD%8D%E7%9C%8B%E4%B8%8D%E6%83%AF%E5%91%98%E5%B7%A5%E6%80%A7%E5%88%AB%E8%A1%A8%E8%BE%BE%EF%BC%9F%E6%AD%A7%E8%A7%86%EF%BC%81.html
  43. Tongyu. 2020. “影响性诉讼⑦：这次，把‘性别认同及性别表达’写进判决.” https://commonlanguage.github.io/TYarchives2020/20200518_1%E5%BD%B1%E5%93%8D%E6%80%A7%E8%AF%89%E8%AE%BC%E2%91%A6%E8%BF%99%E6%AC%A1%EF%BC%8C%E6%8A%8A%E2%80%9C%E6%80%A7%E5%88%AB%E8%AE%A4%E5%90%8C%E5%8F%8A%E6%80%A7%E5%88%AB%E8%A1%A8%E8%BE%BE%E2%80%9D%E5%86%99%E8%BF%9B%E5%88%A4%E5%86%B3.html
  44. Radio Free Asia. 2019. “中国跨性别就业平权第一案.” https://www.rfa.org/mandarin/yataibaodao/shehui/hj-12112019143336.html
  45. Cornell Legal Information Institute. 2020. “Gao v. Beijing Dangdang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (2020).” https://www.law.cornell.edu/gender-justice/resource/Gao_v_Beijing_Dangdang_Information_Technology_Co_Ltd_2020
  46. Project Trans. 2026. “中国大陆跨性别相关法律法规变迁.” https://project-trans.org/china-legal/
  47. Transgender and Gender-Diverse Archive. 2026. “跨性别组织或机构.” https://digital.transchinese.org/社群及NGO文件/其他组织文件/跨性别组织或机构_page/
  48. Project Polymorph. 2026. “《他·她·TA：跨性别华语编年录》.” https://project-polymorph.github.io/trans-history/