How Moving Images Preserve Transgender Public History: An Annotated Guide to Mainland China’s Queer and Trans Screen Archive, 2008–2025

Abstract

Mainland China’s transgender public history has a moving-image lineage that becomes easy to miss when research begins with policy, newspapers, surveys, and institutional records. Around 2008, Cui Zi’en’s Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China assembled interviews with scholars, artists, and activists into a visual history of queer movements and public culture. Brothers (2012) moved trans men’s everyday lives, employment, medical decisions, and self-recognition into the center of a community documentary. The 2017 fiction short Sunken Plum placed a transgender woman character between Chengdu nightlife, a rural hometown, kinship obligation, and gender presentation. In 2021, trans independent filmmaker Yennefer Fang wrote, directed, and produced A Day of Trans, an interview-based documentary following four transgender people across three generations. In 2023, The Last Year of Darkness documented the queer nightlife surrounding Chengdu’s Funky Town and, through its festival metadata, offers a useful reminder that queer scene membership, drag performance, gender expression, and transgender self-identification each require their own evidentiary fields (Icarus Films 2008; Asia Catalyst 2013; Almost Red Productions 2017; Fang 2021; Beijing Queer Film Festival 2023).

This guide organizes those works through a moving-image evidence chain: lived experience/scene → filming relationship → screen work → premiere/release → festival and platform circulation → archival metadata → retrospective curation and research citation. It also introduces a representation-status matrix with seven fields: work_type, subject_position, production_relation, identity_evidence, release_event, circulation_path, and archive_host. Three separate clocks—production_time, release_time, and archive_time—record when the work was made, first made public, and later described or curated. The central argument is that a moving image becomes strongest historical evidence when the content of the work, the relation of production, and the record of circulation travel together. A film can establish that a form of public representation appeared, preserve a community event, or document an urban scene, while claims about personal identity, lived fact, and historical sequence continue through their own source chains.

The guide covers publicly accessible work pages, premiere records, festival archives, distributor metadata, video-platform pages, and retrospective screenings from 2008 through 2025. Its practical reading order starts with the type of work, then identifies who occupies the screen and in what role, reconstructs when and by whom the work became public, and finally follows its movement through festivals, educational distribution, streaming, reposting, and later curation. That method turns a film list into a reproducible public archive of source roles and circulation times.

Keywords: transgender history in China; transgender film; documentary; queer cinema; moving-image archives; film festivals; Chengdu; Brothers; A Day of Trans; Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China

1. Research question: what does a film preserve as historical evidence?

Moving images carry unusually dense historical information. An interview retains a speaker’s voice, the vocabulary available at the time, gesture, spatial setting, and editorial selection. A festival programme adds another layer: premiere date, curatorial category, subtitle language, director biography, venue, runtime, and institutional context. Once a work leaves the original shoot, distributors, universities, festivals, video platforms, reposts, and retrospective programmes continue to generate records around it. Historical research therefore encounters a linked set of objects rather than a single video file.

Scholarship on Chinese independent documentary provides a strong starting point for this approach. Chris Berry, Lu Xinyu, and Lisa Rofel described the new Chinese documentary movement through its commitment to a public record. Luke Robinson examined independent documentary through the practice of xianchang, or being on the scene, while Paul Pickowicz and Yingjin Zhang situated alternative film culture within changing relations among production, censorship, exhibition, and independent circulation (Berry, Lu & Rofel 2010; Robinson 2013; Pickowicz & Zhang 2006). These works make production and circulation part of the historical object itself.

Queer and trans screen history adds the question of subject position. Hongwei Bao’s studies of postsocialist queer China treat film, activist documentary, performance, and urban space as forms of cultural production; Queer/Tongzhi China similarly places media, activism, and knowledge production in one field (Bao 2018, 2020; Engebretsen, Schroeder & Bao 2015). Trans media scholarship pushes further toward self-representation and control over production. Laura Horak examines how trans-created YouTube media constructs intimacy and temporal experience; Tobias Raun reads video blogging as self-narration, community formation, and an archive of bodily change; Anson Koch-Rein, Elahe Haschemi Yekani, and Jasper Verlinden connect visibility to media form, recognition, and power (Horak 2014; Raun 2016; Koch-Rein, Haschemi Yekani & Verlinden 2020).

The guide therefore replaces a broad question such as “does this film contain transgender material?” with seven operational questions. What kind of work is it? Does a person appear as an interview subject, a documentary participant, an actor, a performer, or a member of a scene? How is the production team related to the people on screen? Who supplies the identity label: the person, the filmmaker, a fictional character description, or a curator? When and where did the work first become public? Through which institutions and platforms did it travel? Which archival hosts currently preserve its metadata and its later reception?

2. Materials and method: a seven-field moving-image record

The source set centers five public moving-image nodes: Cui Zi’en’s Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China; the Queer Comrades production Brothers; Roberto F. Canuto and Xu Xiaoxi’s Sunken Plum; Yennefer Fang’s A Day of Trans; and Benjamin Mullinkosson’s The Last Year of Darkness. Each work has a direct relationship to mainland Chinese queer or transgender public history and at least two independently checkable metadata paths. Together, the five works span movement history, community documentary, fictional representation, trans-authored life documentary, and urban queer-scene documentary.

Each screen_record carries seven fields:

Three clocks complement these fields. production_time records shooting or completion; release_time records a first public event; archive_time records the date of a surviving catalogue or later curatorial description. Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China, for example, can be linked from a 2008 copyright/completion record to its 2009 ShanghaiPRIDE circulation and onward to an ACMI retrospective in 2025 (Icarus Films 2008; Frameline 2008; ACMI 2025).

Archival description itself belongs inside the evidence model. K. J. Rawson shows how language and archival environments shape access to transgender materials. Marika Cifor and Stacy Wood connect feminist archival practice to power, representation, and self-historicization, while Michelle Caswell and collaborators show how community archives make marginalized communities representable on their own terms (Rawson 2010; Cifor & Wood 2017; Caswell et al. 2017). For that reason, this guide records the source of historical programme terminology while using present editorial language to separate identity, character, performance, and scene.

3. 2008–2009: Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China turns oral history and movement memory into a screen archive

Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China forms an early anchor for the chronology. Icarus Films lists a 2008 copyright date and describes a documentary built from interviews with more than thirty activists, scholars, and filmmakers, tracing major changes in Chinese LGBT culture and advocacy. Frameline likewise lists it as a Chinese documentary from 2008 and records its later role as the opening-night film of ShanghaiPRIDE in 2009, followed by circulation through the Beijing Queer Film Festival, the Turin GLBT Film Festival, Vancouver, and other international programmes (Icarus Films 2008; Frameline 2008).

Its work_type is historical or movement documentary. The evidence comes from oral interviews, selected earlier media footage, editing, and a historical timeline. Its contribution to transgender public history is contextual: it preserves a broad queer movement frame in which legal, media, educational, activist, and visual-cultural changes can be studied together. A researcher can use it to establish how queer history was being assembled and narrated by the late 2000s. A claim about one specific trans person’s identity or biography then gains precision by adding direct material from that person or a dedicated record.

Later circulation produces a second historical life. The USC U.S.-China Institute records a Pomona College screening in 2011. Mulan International Film Festival revisited the work in 2023 with a bilingual programme and a substantial director biography. ACMI’s 2025 “Focus on Queer 中文 Cinema” screened a long DCP version and identifies both the source and the retrospective curatorial context (USC U.S.-China Institute 2011; Mulan International Film Festival 2023; ACMI 2025).

These records illustrate how curatorial language accumulates around a stable work. The earlier distribution catalogue emphasizes a comprehensive history of queer movements; the 2025 retrospective frames the film as a chronicle of queer life and resistance across several decades. Each description belongs to its own archive_time. In a reception history, those later programme pages show how institutions in a new decade understand and reposition an older film.

4. 2012–2013: Brothers moves trans men from shared queer context to the center of the frame

Brothers marks a shift in subject position. Trans Male Resources catalogues it as a 2012 documentary from China centered on Tony and other trans men who refer to one another as “brothers,” with themes including self-recognition, employment, medical transition, and everyday barriers (Trans Male Resources 2026). The trans male community occupies the documentary center rather than one segment of a broad movement history.

The strongest contextual record comes from the 2013 premiere event. Asia Catalyst preserves a bilingual account of a May 17 International Day Against Homophobia event in Beijing titled “lgbT – Increasing Transgender Visibility in China.” The Netherlands Embassy and several Chinese LGBT organizations participated; around eighty people from media, universities, counseling organizations, embassies, and other institutions attended; the event included the premiere of Brothers and discussion of transgender issues. The page also identifies Queer Comrades as the producer (Asia Catalyst 2013).

This creates a dual archive of work and event. The film preserves trans men’s narrated lives. The premiere record preserves the organizers, venue, public theme, audience composition, and an explicit effort to raise transgender visibility in Beijing in 2013. Reading both together changes the historical question. Researchers can examine how trans men narrated work, medicine, and identity, and can also reconstruct how LGBT organizations positioned transgender issues within a public programme at that moment.

The surviving metadata also demonstrates lateral preservation. The Asia Catalyst page points toward the historical Queer Comrades site, whose web presence has changed over time; a later specialist film directory preserves a synopsis and discovery path. The present archive_host is therefore distributed across a contemporaneous partner record and later cataloguing. Rawson’s discussion of archival access and Caswell’s work on community archives help explain why these description layers matter alongside the moving-image object itself (Rawson 2010; Caswell et al. 2017).

5. 2017: Sunken Plum separates historical evidence from fictional transgender representation

Sunken Plum belongs to another source class. Almost Red Productions describes the 2017 Chinese-Spanish short as an LGBTQ drama following Li Wanying, a transgender woman working in a Chengdu nightclub who returns to a rural hometown after her mother’s death and navigates kinship obligations and gender presentation. The production page says the story was inspired by online videos depicting abuse of transgender people in China and documents independent production and crowdfunding before extensive festival circulation (Almost Red Productions 2017). Apple TV independently catalogues the work as a 2017 drama of roughly nineteen minutes and identifies the protagonist as a transgender Chinese woman character (Apple TV 2017).

The key field is work_type=fiction/drama. Its strongest historical contribution concerns representation: it shows how filmmakers in the mid-2010s encoded a cluster of themes—trans femininity, Chengdu nightlife, rural family, funeral obligation, concealment, and self-expression—into a narrative work intended for public circulation. The production account also identifies the real-world media stimulus behind the screenplay. Individual lived facts and population-wide claims acquire their own supporting evidence from direct records, oral histories, surveys, or policy sources.

This source distinction matters throughout trans screen history. Koch-Rein and colleagues connect representation to visibility, medium, and control over the means of representation. Andre Cavalcante’s study of transgender media belonging likewise places mediated recognition within ordinary social life (Koch-Rein, Haschemi Yekani & Verlinden 2020; Cavalcante 2018). Fiction therefore works as evidence of public imagination and cultural coding, complementary to documentary evidence of a person speaking in their own voice.

The later festival life of Sunken Plum supplies a reception archive. A 2025 Beijing Queer Film Festival director biography retrospectively lists screenings at Shanghai Pride Film Festival, Hong Kong Queer Film Festival, and Beijing Love Queer Film Festival, among many others, while the current production page reports a much larger international festival trajectory (Beijing Queer Film Festival 2025; Almost Red Productions 2017). Those totals belong to the publisher and date that produced them. Preserving publisher + archive_time + circulation_count lets a future researcher observe growth in the film’s claimed reach without flattening multiple retrospective snapshots into one timeless statistic.

6. 2021: A Day of Trans joins trans authorship, lived testimony, and direct platform publication

A Day of Trans moves production relations again. The filmmaker’s Vimeo page identifies Yennefer Fang as writer, director, and producer, gives a twenty-minute runtime, and describes four Chinese transgender people across three generations discussing lived experience, careers, community participation, social barriers, and approaches to life. The bilingual page links the work to Transgender Day of Remembrance in November 2021 (Fang 2021).

Contemporaneous public records provide a release history. A November 2021 Global Times arts report describes Fang as a Chinese transgender independent filmmaker and reports a Beijing release for the film, connecting its interview format to Fang’s own experience. A Business Wire release records a November 18 Beijing theatre premiere and carries comments from the Beijing LGBT Center’s trans-project leadership about representation and public dialogue (Global Times 2021; Yennefer Fang Studios 2021).

Together, the creator-controlled video page, contemporary news report, and production release make the production_relation unusually visible. A trans filmmaker leads the project; trans interviewees appear as lived-life subjects; the release is explicitly situated within a transgender commemorative and public-discussion context. This pattern resonates with Horak and Raun’s work on trans-authored screen media, where people on screen can occupy the roles of narrator, community knowledge holder, and media maker rather than serving solely as objects of explanation (Horak 2014; Raun 2016).

Platform circulation then adds a later record. A 2022 Bilibili page for A Day of Trans retains the title, year, Chinese synopsis, and public tags including transgender and LGBT (Bilibili 2022). The Vimeo page and the Bilibili page have separate archival roles. The former preserves a creator-controlled public description; the latter documents subsequent Chinese-platform recirculation and tagging. Keeping uploader provenance separate from work provenance makes both records useful.

7. 2023: The Last Year of Darkness clarifies the boundary between identity and scene classification

The Last Year of Darkness turns toward Chengdu’s Funky Town. The Beijing Queer Film Festival catalogue identifies a 2023 China–United States documentary feature directed by Benjamin Mullinkosson and lists Yihao, 647, Darkle, Kimberly, and Gennady Baranov among its subjects. The synopsis describes an underground social world of DJs, artists, drag performers, lovers, ravers, and skaters. IDFA, Queer East, and Visions du Réel preserve parallel programme records centered on queer nightlife, urban transformation, friendship, and youth (Beijing Queer Film Festival 2023; IDFA 2023a; Queer East 2024; Visions du Réel 2023).

This work is especially useful for calibrating identity_evidence. Festival records identify some people through scene roles such as drag performer and classify the wider social space as queer. An archive can therefore safely record “queer scene,” “drag performance,” “DJ,” “artist,” and other documented roles. A more specific claim about one person’s transgender self-identification calls for that person’s own account or another explicit identity source. The method preserves the richness of queer scene history while keeping performance role, gender expression, and identity in distinct data fields.

That distinction applies across the chronology. Broad LGBT history documentaries gather several communities under one frame. Community documentaries center a specific trans constituency. Fiction constructs characters. Scene documentaries capture spaces where multiple identities and practices coexist. A representation-status matrix lets each work contribute the evidence it actually holds.

IDFA preserves an unusual derivative archive as well. The Last Year of Darkness – Live Edit Party used hundreds of hours of raw footage in a live re-edit, while people associated with the filmed scene participated through music and performance (IDFA 2023b). The record shows that finished films are only one layer of a moving-image archive. Raw footage, live remixing, festival events, and performance can create secondary archival objects whose provenance becomes important if original material later enters a filmmaker or institutional collection.

8. A moving-image chronology, 2008–2025

Placing the five works along production_time → release_time → circulation_time → archive_time creates a chronology richer than release years alone:

The chronology reveals a process of archival thickening. Completion is one node. Premiere, reposting, festival selection, educational distribution, and retrospective screening add dates, descriptions, and institutional relationships. Marijke de Valck’s film-festival research shows how festivals function as circuits of valuation, circulation, and cultural memory (de Valck 2007). Chinese independent film has relied especially heavily on festivals, universities, community screenings, and digital platforms to sustain a public life outside conventional theatrical distribution (Robinson 2013; Bao 2020).

9. A representation-status matrix: what can each work support?

The five nodes become clearer in a comparative matrix:

The matrix controls the granularity of historical claims. work_type locates the factual register. subject_position distinguishes self-narration from performance. identity_evidence identifies the source that supplies a label. circulation_path shows which publics encountered the work later.

Trans media scholarship repeatedly links visibility to authorship and social power. Cavalcante situates mediated belonging in everyday recognition; Koch-Rein and collaborators analyze the tensions attached to trans visibility; Jamie Capuzza and Leland Spencer show how television analysis benefits from separating presence, characterization, embodiment, and interaction (Cavalcante 2018; Koch-Rein, Haschemi Yekani & Verlinden 2020; Capuzza & Spencer 2017). Applied to Chinese moving-image archives, this fielded approach prevents queer scene, drag performance, fictional trans character, and transgender self-identification from collapsing into a single category.

10. Counterevidence and boundaries: richer images require clearer source roles

The first boundary comes from editing. Documentary retains real people and real spaces while camera position, interview prompts, footage selection, subtitles, sound, and montage shape the finished work. William Callahan’s discussion of documentary filmmaking as a critical visual method treats that production process as knowledge-making and as evidence of the filmmaker’s position (Callahan 2015). A documentary directly supports claims about what a person said on camera, what a scene recorded, and how a work organized that material. Population prevalence, broad social frequency, and causal explanation draw strength from surveys, policy records, additional oral histories, and statistical research.

The second boundary comes from fiction. Sunken Plum has explicit connections to real social concerns and to online material that inspired its creators, while its work type remains narrative drama. Its cultural-historical value is substantial because it records how filmmakers translated Chengdu, rural kinship, family duty, and a trans woman character into a story built for circulation. Event history and representation history proceed through separate evidence tracks and meet again when the research question asks which real-world concerns entered public imagination.

The third boundary comes from curatorial metadata. Festivals add labels such as LGBTQ+, queer, transgender, documentary, human rights, and underground culture. Those labels are direct evidence of how a festival classified a work at a particular time. Personal identity research gives priority to self-description and explicit biographical material when a curator’s broad category covers an ensemble or scene.

The fourth boundary comes from versions. Icarus and Frameline commonly catalogue a sixty-minute version of Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China, while ACMI’s 2025 retrospective identifies a 118-minute DCP. Programme pages for The Last Year of Darkness likewise carry runtime variations. A durable archive stores version/runtime/source together. Cuts, regional distribution versions, festival copies, and catalogue entry practices can all generate differences, and provenance preserves those differences as researchable facts.

The fifth boundary comes from access. Historical community sites move, videos migrate, and programme pages change. This guide addresses publicly reachable material in 2026. Earlier private screenings, closed community recordings, and personal hard-drive collections belong to a different research design involving oral history, collection permissions, or institutional archival partnership. The public-web archive establishes a reproducible floor for future work rather than a ceiling on what once existed.

11. Building a maintainable moving-image archive

The first operational step is object-level cataloguing. Each work receives a stable work_id; variant URLs, titles, languages, runtimes, cuts, and screenings attach to that object. A practical schema is:

{work_id, title_zh, title_en, work_type, completion_date, release_event, subject_position, identity_evidence, creators, production_relation, runtime_version, screening_event, archive_host, source_role, record_time, source_url}

The second step is event-level cataloguing. A festival screening, Beijing premiere, video-platform upload, retrospective, and live-edit event each receives an event_id. “The work exists” and “institution X publicly screened it on date Y” then become separately queryable claims.

The third step is preservation of production authority. Director, producer, uploader, filmed subject, actor, character, and provider of archival footage occupy different roles. A Day of Trans benefits from distinct creator_identity/self-description and subject_identity/self-description fields. Sunken Plum separates actor from character. The Last Year of Darkness separates scene_role=drag performer from any field reserved for personal gender identity.

The fourth step stores versions and subtitles. Overseas festivals often use English subtitles, DCPs, or runtime variants. 誌同志, Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China, and romanized variants should resolve to the same work object while retaining title provenance. A researcher can then identify the exact version encountered at a specific screening.

The fifth step records later curation. Mulan in 2023 and ACMI in 2025 show an older film acquiring fresh historical meaning. A curatorial_frame attached to every retrospective makes reception history searchable: when was the work presented as movement history, queer cinema canon, Chinese-language screen history, educational resource, or activist documentary?

Conclusion: turn a film list into a moving-image evidence network

Public records from 2008 through 2025 show several recording systems forming mainland China’s transgender moving-image public history. Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China provides a broad screen framework for queer movement history. Brothers connects trans men’s lives to a 2013 Beijing visibility event. Sunken Plum preserves the entrance of a transgender woman character into independent narrative film. A Day of Trans joins trans authorship, cross-generational interview testimony, and direct platform publication. The Last Year of Darkness preserves Chengdu queer nightlife, drag performance, art, friendship, and urban space through a scene documentary.

The moving-image evidence chain writes these relationships as lived experience/scene → filming relationship → screen work → premiere/release → festival and platform circulation → archival metadata → retrospective curation and research citation. The representation-status matrix adds work_type × subject_position × identity_evidence × circulation_path. Together they reveal both life inside the frame and the institutions carrying the frame through time.

The longer historical lesson concerns the unit of preservation. Transgender public memory lives in far more than a video file. A 2013 premiere notice preserves an organizational network and a public agenda. A 2021 creator-controlled Vimeo page preserves authorship and self-description. A 2023 festival catalogue preserves a curatorial classification of Chengdu nightlife. A 2025 retrospective page records how an older documentary enters a new history of queer Chinese cinema. Linking those records back to stable work objects allows future researchers to reconstruct who filmed whom, when a work became public, under which identity and genre labels it travelled, which institutions preserved it, and how each later curator interpreted the image anew.

References

Academic and research sources

1. Bao, Hongwei. 2018. Queer Comrades: Gay Identity and Tongzhi Activism in Postsocialist China. NIAS Press. https://www.iias.asia/the-newsletter/article/queer-comrades
2. Bao, Hongwei. 2020. Queer China: Lesbian and Gay Literature and Visual Culture under Postsocialism. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Queer-China-Lesbian-and-Gay-Literature-and-Visual-Culture-under-Postso/Bao/p/book/9780367819071
3. Engebretsen, Elisabeth L., William F. Schroeder, and Hongwei Bao, eds. 2015. Queer/Tongzhi China: New Perspectives on Research, Activism and Media Cultures. NIAS Press. https://cnlgbtdata.com/files/uploads/2024/06/Queer_Tongzhi_China.pdf
4. Lim, Song Hwee. 2006. Celluloid Comrades: Representations of Male Homosexuality in Contemporary Chinese Cinemas. University of Hawai‘i Press. https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/celluloid-comrades-representations-of-male-homosexuality-in-contemporary-chinese-cinemas/
5. Liu, Petrus. 2015. Queer Marxism in Two Chinas. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/queer-marxism-in-two-chinas
6. Rofel, Lisa. 2007. Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/desiring-china
7. Berry, Chris, Lu Xinyu, and Lisa Rofel, eds. 2010. The New Chinese Documentary Film Movement: For the Public Record. Hong Kong University Press. https://www.nypl.org/research/research-catalog/bib/b19863183
8. Robinson, Luke. 2013. Independent Chinese Documentary: From the Studio to the Street. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137271228
9. Pickowicz, Paul G., and Yingjin Zhang, eds. 2006. From Underground to Independent: Alternative Film Culture in Contemporary China. Rowman & Littlefield. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL18524331W
10. Zhang, Zhen, ed. 2007. The Urban Generation: Chinese Cinema and Society at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Duke University Press. https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-urban-generation
11. de Valck, Marijke. 2007. Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam University Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/35273
12. Callahan, William A. 2015. “The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method.” Millennium. https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/64668/
13. Caswell, Michelle, Alda Allina Migoni, Noah Geraci, and Marika Cifor. 2017. “‘To Be Able to Imagine Otherwise’: Community Archives and the Importance of Representation.” Archives and Records. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1h54v9m9/qt1h54v9m9.pdf
14. Cifor, Marika, and Stacy Wood. 2017. “Critical Feminism in the Archives.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 1(2). https://journals.litwinbooks.com/index.php/jclis/article/view/27
15. Rawson, K. J. 2010. “Accessing Transgender // Desiring Queer(er?) Archival Logics.” Archivaria 68: 123–140. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13234
16. Stryker, Susan. 2008. Transgender History. Seal Press. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/susan-stryker/transgender-history/9781580056908/
17. Koch-Rein, Anson, Elahe Haschemi Yekani, and Jasper J. Verlinden. 2020. “Representing Trans: Visibility and Its Discontents.” European Journal of English Studies 24(1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13825577.2020.1730040
18. Raun, Tobias. 2016. Out Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on YouTube. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Out-Online-Trans-Self-Representation-and-Community-Building-on-YouTube/Raun/p/book/9781472466761
19. Horak, Laura. 2014. “Trans on YouTube: Intimacy, Visibility, Temporality.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 1(4). https://transreads.org/trans-on-youtube-intimacy-visibility-temporality/
20. Cavalcante, Andre. 2018. Struggling for Ordinary: Media and Transgender Belonging in Everyday Life. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479864584/struggling-for-ordinary/
21. Duguay, Stefanie. 2016. “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Visibility Through Selfies: Comparing Platform Mediators Across Ruby Rose’s Instagram and Vine Presence.” Social Media + Society. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/94316/
22. Tse, Audrey. 2011. Queering Chinese Comrades! Through the Lens of Director Cui Zi’En. Thesis. https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Queering_Chinese_Comrades_Through_the_Lens_of_Director_Cui_Zi_En/6686321
23. Capuzza, Jamie C., and Leland G. Spencer. 2017. “Regressing, Progressing, or Transgressing on the Small Screen? Transgender Characters on U.S. Scripted Television Series.” Communication Quarterly 65(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1221438

Film, premiere, festival, distribution, and platform archives

24. Icarus Films. 2008. “Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China.” https://icarusfilms.com/df-qc
25. Frameline. 2008. “Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China.” https://www.frameline.org/distribution/films/queer-china-comrade-china
26. Mulan International Film Festival. 2023. “誌同志 Queer China ‘Comrade’ China.” https://mulanfestival.com/zh/festival-2023/queer-china-comrade-china/
27. ACMI. 2025. “Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China — Focus on Queer 中文 Cinema.” https://www.acmi.net.au/whats-on/focus-on-queer-chinese-cinema/comrade-china/
28. USC U.S.-China Institute. 2011. “Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China.” https://china.usc.edu/event/queer-china-comrade-china
29. Asia Catalyst. 2013. “国际不再恐同日，跨性别纪录片《兄弟》首映 / Beijing IDAHO Event Increases Transgender Visibility in China with the Premiere of the Documentary ‘Brothers’.” https://asiacatalyst.org/blog/2013/05/22/_-_beijing_idaho_event_increases_transgender_visibility_in_china_with_the_premiere_of_the_documentar/
30. Trans Male Resources. 2026. “Brothers (2012) | Trans Male Documentary.” https://www.transmaleresources.com/media/brothers2012
31. Fang, Yennefer. 2021. “A Day of Trans.mp4.” Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/647384537
32. Global Times. 2021. “New Documentary ‘A Day of Trans’ Explores Experiences of Three Generations of Chinese Transgender Persons.” https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202111/1239389.shtml
33. Yennefer Fang Studios. 2021. “Groundbreaking Documentary ‘A Day of Trans’ Explores the Experiences of Three Generations of Transgender Individuals in China.” Business Wire. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211118006079/en/Groundbreaking-Documentary-A-Day-of-Trans-Explores-the-Experiences-of-Three-Generations-of-Transgender-Individuals-in-China
34. Bilibili. 2022. “〖4K〗跨越性别的一天 A Day of Trans.” https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1pD4y1e7KB/
35. Almost Red Productions. 2017. “Sunken Plum (2017).” https://almostredprod.vhx.tv/products/sunken-plum-2017
36. Apple TV. 2017. “Sunken Plum.” https://tv.apple.com/us/movie/sunken-plum/umc.cmc.2x37sg8c8a8wi113i91u2wusc
37. Beijing Queer Film Festival. 2025. “时间的审判 IUS of Time — Director Biography.” https://www.bjqff.com/festival-history/18th-festival/ius-of-time/
38. Beijing Queer Film Festival. 2023. “午夜出走 The Last Year of Darkness.” https://www.bjqff.com/festival-history/16th-festival/%E5%8D%88%E5%A4%9C%E5%87%BA%E8%B5%B0-the-last-year-of-darkness/
39. IDFA. 2023a. “The Last Year of Darkness.” https://www.idfa.nl/en/film/75c26347-109d-4202-a9fe-ab00e85ca6b2/the-last-year-of-darkness/
40. IDFA. 2023b. “The Last Year of Darkness – Live Edit Party.” https://www.idfa.nl/en/film/a7a205ea-1239-42c7-b34d-6dbc73360fe2/the-last-year-of-darkness-live-edit-party/
41. Queer East. 2024. “The Last Year of Darkness.” https://queereast.org.uk/programme/the-last-year-of-darkness/
42. Visions du Réel. 2023. “The Last Year of Darkness.” https://www.visionsdureel.ch/en/film/2023/the-last-year-of-darkness/
43. MUBI. 2023. “The Last Year of Darkness.” https://mubi.com/en/ch/films/the-last-year-of-darkness
44. Docuseek. 2008. “Queer China, ‘Comrade’ China.” https://docuseek.com/df-qc
45. Beijing Queer Film Festival. 2023. “16th Closing Film.” https://www.bjqff.com/category/festival-history/16th-festival/16th-closing-film/
46. Mulan International Film Festival. 2023. “Queer China ‘Comrade’ China.” https://mulanfestival.com/festival-2023/queer-china-comrade-china/