From Confidential Surgery to Woman’s Dream: How Zhang Kesha’s Public Narrative Took Shape, 1983–2003

Abstract

On January 10, 1983, Zhang Kesha underwent surgery in the plastic-surgery service of the Third Hospital of Beijing Medical College. A 2026 institutional retrospective from Peking University Third Hospital describes the procedure as China’s first male-to-female gender-reassignment operation and emphasizes the strict confidentiality surrounding the case. Twenty years later, in 2003, Zhang appeared under her own name in reports by Xinhua, Southern Metropolis Daily, Changsha Evening News, Huashang Daily, Yangtze Evening News, and other outlets. She joined publication and book-signing events for Woman’s Dream: China’s First Transgender Person, turning a life that had circulated through clinical records, participant memory, local oral knowledge, and private experience into a nationally reproducible public narrative (Xinhua 2003a, 2003b; Southern Metropolis Daily 2003; Changsha Evening News 2003; Huashang Daily 2003; Yangtze Evening News 2003; PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2026).

The central historical problem concerns the transformation of a confidential clinical event into public history through two decades of social circulation and participant narration. This article proposes the public-history relay: clinical event → local oral visibility → accumulation of private narrative → editorial collaboration → publication fixation → press-tour circulation → institutional retrospective and digital preservation. Each relay stage adds a new capacity for recording, while changing authorship, audience, evidentiary distance, and scale. The article also proposes a narrative-provenance ledger with the fields event_time, record_time, speaker, genre, audience, publicity_level, source_distance, and retelling_risk.

The core argument is that 2003 marks a simultaneous shift in narrative agency and documentary form. The 1983 operation had already generated clinical consequences and intense local social visibility. Publication and interviews in 2003 enabled Zhang to participate directly in deciding which experiences entered public text, how she explained years of guarded biography and social pressure, and how her life chronology reached readers across China. Publishers, journalists, and later institutional historians then placed that story inside public frames such as “first person,” “first case,” and “legendary life.” Zhang’s case therefore reveals a foundational mechanism of transgender public history: historical events, first-person narration, media packaging, and institutional memory possess distinct production dates, and the historian gains precision by tracing the relay among them.

Keywords: Zhang Kesha; transgender history in China; Woman’s Dream; life writing; public history; media history; Peking University Third Hospital; gender reassignment; archives

1. Research question: how does a confidential event become public history?

Zhang Kesha’s history can now be compressed into a single sentence: in 1983, she underwent an operation later described by Peking University Third Hospital as China’s first male-to-female gender-reassignment surgery. That sentence efficiently locates a medical-history milestone. It also compresses a second process that lasted roughly twenty years: who knew about the event, who possessed the authority to recount it, which accounts entered public media, and which records gained nationwide reproducibility.

GenderLibs’ earlier coordinate guide to medical “first” claims separates surgery, geography, public identity, identity documents, and national regulation into distinct historical coordinates. The annotated guide to PUH3’s public archive compares the 1983 and 1984 institutional dates and later hospital records. The present case study follows another question. It makes publicity itself the historical object. The unit of analysis shifts from the ranking of an operation to the channels through which one person gained an attributable public narrative and through which that narrative acquired durable forms.

Trans history scholarship has long emphasized the relationships among naming, archival entry points, medical classification, and subject narration. Howard Chiang’s work on the medical history of sex and gender in modern China shows how bodily techniques and sexological knowledge are repeatedly reorganized by changing professional languages and public cultures. K. J. Rawson’s work on transgender archival logics shows how description and retrieval systems shape later access to a life. R. Hickman situates trans history as a historiographical field whose objects and methods continue to evolve (Chiang 2012, 2018; Rawson 2013; Hickman 2021). Hongwei Bao’s studies of queer Chinese media and cultural production further show how identity acquires social space through print, moving image, websites, events, and community media (Bao 2020, 2021; Engebretsen, Schroeder & Bao 2015).

Zhang’s case condenses these questions into a clear chronology. In 1983, the operation generated a first layer of medical, administrative, family, and participant records. Afterward, her workplace and acquaintance networks in Changsha generated local oral circulation. Across the 1990s and early 2000s, Zhang accumulated personal narrative material while living with the pressures attached to other people’s knowledge of her history. In 2003, she collaborated with publisher and writer Deng Yingru on Woman’s Dream, joined bookstore events, and gave nationally circulated interviews. In 2026, PUH3 integrated the 1983 episode into an institutional memorial history of Professor Wang Damei (Xinhua 2003a, 2003b; Changsha Evening News 2003; PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2026). These linked stages form the public-history relay developed in this article.

2. Sources and method: record who spoke, when, through which genre, and to which audience

The study uses four source groups. The first consists of the concentrated 2003 press record: Xinhua’s April interview from Dalian; June reporting around the publication of Woman’s Dream; Changsha Evening News on the production of the book and its signing event; a long Southern Metropolis Daily interview; a Huashang Daily profile; and the Yangtze Evening News report from the Nanjing signing. These sources appeared close together in time while preserving different combinations of Zhang’s voice, Deng Yingru’s publishing account, reporter framing, audience reaction, and event description (Xinhua 2003a, 2003b; Changsha Evening News 2003; Southern Metropolis Daily 2003; Huashang Daily 2003; Yangtze Evening News 2003).

The second group consists of hospital and policy records. PUH3’s 2012 departmental history and its 2026 memorial to Wang Damei preserve institutional versions of the early operation. National medical-technology rules from 2009, 2017, and 2022 show how the state later encoded a field once organized around individual clinical cases into formal categories of national technical governance. PUH3’s 2018 multidisciplinary-team material and 2025 patient guide show later service organization (PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2012, 2018, 2025, 2026; Ministry of Health 2009; National Health and Family Planning Commission 2017; National Health Commission 2022).

The third group provides scholarly context: histories of medicine and sexuality, archival studies, transgender health research, legal-gender-recognition scholarship, digital identity research, and studies of queer media in China (Chiang 2012, 2018; Rawson 2013; Brügger 2018; Bao 2020, 2021; Liu 2023; Liu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2023). The fourth group covers later preservation and recirculation: a transgender news archive preserving old reports and source metadata, Project Trans’s legal chronology, Fridae’s 2009 account linking Zhang’s image to contemporary public reporting, and a 2023 English-language biography that demonstrates the continued international repackaging of her story (Transgender News Archive 2026; Project Trans 2026; Fridae 2009; Eastley 2023).

Each biographical source is entered into eight fields:

The ledger places biographical claims and circulation claims beside each other. A 2003 interview can preserve a recollection of 1983 and, simultaneously, serve as contemporary evidence for Zhang’s public posture in 2003. When a historian uses the former, the twenty-year distance belongs in the citation logic. When the research question concerns 2003 media culture, the same interview becomes a near-contemporary source. The value of a source changes with the claim it supports.

3. 1983: clinical confidentiality and local visibility emerged together

PUH3’s 2026 memorial to Professor Wang Damei provides the most detailed hospital chronology currently available on the public web. It records Zhang’s admission on January 3, 1983 and an operation of about twelve hours on January 10. The retrospective also describes psychiatric documentation, a parental signature, institutional advocacy, and higher-level approval. The hospital labels the procedure China’s first male-to-female gender-reassignment operation and records strict confidentiality around it (PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2026).

Xinhua’s 2003 Dalian interview adds another layer. It recounts the tightly controlled clinical disclosure around the operation and then describes Zhang’s return to Changsha, where she worked at a Friendship Store and became the focus of intense curiosity after news circulated by word of mouth. The two scenes belong to different communication systems. A hospital can govern records, approvals, and press disclosure. Workplaces, acquaintance networks, and city gossip generate their own oral knowledge. One life can therefore occupy a confidential clinical archive and an intensely visible local social environment at the same time (Xinhua 2003a).

This distinction matters for public history. Treating 1983–2003 as a single silent interval erases workplace observation, local rumor, family knowledge, and social pressure. Treating local oral circulation as equivalent to nationally attributable publicity erases the importance of signed authorship, fixed texts, participant agency, and cross-regional reproduction. A more precise model uses levels of visibility: clinical knowledge → family and acquaintance knowledge → local oral visibility → exposure pressure → attributed voluntary publicity → national media replication → institutional historicization.

Medical history also helps locate this stage. Chiang describes a long twentieth-century reorganization of Chinese sexology, gendered bodies, and medical knowledge, while later clinical guidelines and national regulations formalized increasingly stable professional pathways (Chiang 2012, 2018; Hembree et al. 2009, 2017; Coleman et al. 2012, 2022). Zhang’s 1983 operation occurred before the national technical standards introduced in 2009. Early practice therefore depended heavily on particular physicians, departmental capacity, approval networks, family and psychiatric documentation, and case-specific institutional advocacy. From 2009 onward, national texts supplied increasingly standardized names, institutional requirements, and quality-control fields (Ministry of Health 2009; National Health and Family Planning Commission 2017; National Health Commission 2022).

4. The intervening twenty years: private narrative accumulation and exposure pressure shaped the move toward publication

A central theme repeats across the June 2003 press record: Zhang described publication as an active decision to place her own history in the open. Xinhua’s June account states that Woman’s Dream mainly covered her life through 1995 and links years of guarded biography with episodes in which knowledge of her history became a source of coercive pressure. A related report records a long period of personal writing and a manuscript-sized body of autobiographical material accumulated over years (Xinhua 2003b; Workers’ Daily Tianxun Online / Sanxiang Metropolis Daily 2003).

These reports give publicity an institutional meaning. Private knowledge held by a small number of people can give those people disproportionate control over disclosure. Publication changes the structure. Experiences become text shaped with the participant, fixed by an editorial process, issued by a publisher, and available to a broad reading public. Zhang repeatedly framed the 2003 decision as a release through public disclosure (Xinhua 2003b; Yangtze Evening News 2003). This article calls the transformation a shift in narrative agency: information moves from fragmented knowledge capable of selective exposure into a public account whose scale and timing involve the person at its center.

The sources also require a distinction between autobiographical material and final authorship. Changsha Evening News gives unusually detailed information about the making of Woman’s Dream. Deng Yingru initially encountered the project as a publisher and planner. Zhang already had an earlier manuscript produced through another collaboration, and she had also accumulated her own written recollections. After the earlier writing arrangement changed, Deng assumed authorship of the final book. The published work is therefore best understood as collaborative life writing: Zhang supplied the lived experience and a substantial body of self-organized narrative, while authorship, editing, approval, and publishing shaped the final public artifact (Changsha Evening News 2003).

This collaborative structure matters for historical use. Woman’s Dream can be read as a major vehicle of Zhang’s public self-narration while its bibliographic record continues to identify Deng Yingru as the author and Hunan Literature and Art Publishing House as the publisher. Bao’s studies of queer cultural production in China emphasize the institutional environments through which texts, films, and performances acquire public effects. Liu’s research on Chinese transgender digital gender practices shows how media environments actively shape self-presentation and judgments of authenticity (Bao 2020, 2021; Liu 2023). Woman’s Dream offers a print-era case of the same broader phenomenon: subject experience, editorial labor, market classification, and public identity meet inside one cultural object.

5. 2003: one book turned a life into a nationally reproducible chronology

The public record becomes unusually dense in 2003. On April 14, Xinhua’s Dalian channel published a long profile that presented Zhang as newly willing to confront public attention. In early June, reporting from Today Morning Post, Sanxiang Metropolis Daily, and related outlets treated the publication of Woman’s Dream as a news event. On June 8, Deng Yingru and Zhang held a signing at Hunan Book City. In mid-June, Changsha Evening News reconstructed the publishing process while Southern Metropolis Daily ran an extensive interview. A Guangzhou signing generated another cycle of profiles, and a September signing in Nanjing led Yangtze Evening News to retell the 1983 operation and the motives Zhang attached to publication (Xinhua 2003a, 2003b; Workers’ Daily Tianxun Online / Sanxiang Metropolis Daily 2003; Changsha Evening News 2003; Southern Metropolis Daily 2003; Huashang Daily 2003; Yangtze Evening News 2003).

This cluster shows three historical capacities of print publication. First, it fixes chronology. The book and surrounding interviews arrange childhood, military service, discharge, factory work in Dongguan, the 1983 operation, work in Changsha, marriage, and later life into a sequence that readers can revisit. Second, it creates attributable sources. Reporters can assign specific memories to Zhang, the publication process to Deng and the publisher, and the surgical claim to PUH3 and its medical setting. Third, it expands reproducibility. A shared set of biographical facts moves among Xinhua, local newspapers, portal sites, bookstore events, and television cameras, giving readers in multiple cities access to a common narrative.

The Changsha Evening News report on the June 8 signing is especially revealing. It describes hundreds of readers, television cameras, audience comments, and the interaction between Zhang and Deng around a book marketed as a long-form documentary work on gender transition. The signing created a new public scene in which participant, author, publisher, television reporter, newspaper reporter, bookseller, and ordinary reader occupied the same event. Public history moved from pages into performance and then returned to newspapers and portal sites as a report about that performance (Changsha Evening News 2003).

The Southern Metropolis Daily interview opened with the idea that Zhang now wanted everyone to know that she was transgender. This 2003 posture forms a sharp temporal contrast with the strict clinical confidentiality described around the 1983 operation. The two sources describe different moments and different media conditions. One records the governance of a sensitive medical case; the other records a participant entering a nationwide publicity circuit through her own name, a published book, and a signing tour (Southern Metropolis Daily 2003; PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2026).

6. How “China’s first” became a media package and a durable search entry point

Many reports from 2003 placed “China’s first transgender person” or an equivalent “first” formulation in the headline, lead, or book subtitle. The label performed obvious media work. It provided readers with an immediate narrative entry point and gave the publication campaign a highly compressed identity frame. Xinhua, Changsha Evening News, Huashang Daily, Yangtze Evening News, and other reports circulated closely related formulations, while the subtitle of Woman’s Dream itself used the same language (Xinhua 2003a; Changsha Evening News 2003; Huashang Daily 2003; Yangtze Evening News 2003).

The label also creates an archival risk because surgery date, public identity, celebrity status, legal status, and personal biography can all be folded into one superlative. GenderLibs’ earlier first-claim coordinate model separates nationwide surgical claims, regional surgical claims, publicly identified cases, and marriage-registration claims. The present case study asks a different question: what did the superlative accomplish in 2003? It gave Zhang a stable index term in news databases and public memory, and later retellings continued to inherit the same legendary frame.

A 2009 Fridae report on Chinese Health Ministry rules referred to a 2008 China Daily photograph caption that described Zhang through the 1983 event and the familiar “first transsexual person in China” formulation. By 2023, an English-language market contained a biography titled China’s First Transgender: The Life and Times of Zhang Kesha (Fridae 2009; Eastley 2023). The “first” frame therefore crossed language, platform, and decade, becoming one of the durable handles attached to her public persona.

Historical practice gains precision by retaining the handle while splitting the claims beneath it. Headlines and search terms document media memory. Surgical dates and procedural claims return to hospital records, contemporary interviews, and policy context. Private-life claims are weighed by speaker, genre, source distance, and repetition. The superlative survives as a historical fact about public packaging while the underlying biography remains open to source-by-source verification.

7. From participant narration to institutional retrospective: the hospital receives the relay forty-three years later

PUH3’s 2026 memorial to Professor Wang Damei adds a new stage to the relay. Organized around departmental history and Wang’s professional legacy, the article places the Zhang Kesha case inside a genealogy of surgical innovation. It supplies the January 3 admission date, the January 10 operation, an approximately twelve-hour procedure, psychiatric documentation, parental authorization, and the approval process. It also reproduces a message Zhang wrote for a memorial event for Wang on September 1, 2024 (PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2026).

The institutional retrospective and the 2003 press cycle emphasize different dimensions of the same event. Media stories from 2003 concentrate on Zhang’s life, her decision to speak, relationships, social pressure, publishing, and encounters with readers. The 2026 hospital article foregrounds physician decision-making, departmental capacity, approval procedures, and professional inheritance. One public-memory project centers “how I lived”; the other centers “how the institution carried out and remembers the case.” Their coexistence gives the historian a richer record.

PUH3’s 2012 sixtieth-anniversary materials provide another reason to preserve version history. That earlier institutional chronology associated 1984 with an early “sex-change surgery” milestone, while the 2026 memorial supplies the precise January 1983 chronology (PUH3 Department of Plastic Surgery 2012, 2026). The difference belongs in record_time and revision_time. Later institutional work may draw on newly organized archives, participant recollection, or revised departmental history. A responsible record keeps both versions and allows institutional memory itself to become part of the chronology.

Digital archives then extend the relay further. The Transgender News Archive preserves old 2003 reports together with source metadata; the Chinese Transgender Digital Archive preserves medical-system pages; Project Trans compiles legal and policy change; public search reconnects these materials with newer research and journalism (Transgender News Archive 2026; Chinese Transgender Digital Archive 2026; Project Trans 2026). Brügger’s history of the archived web treats capture, migration, and version as historical properties of web material. Rawson’s archival work shows how descriptive choices influence which people and which records future researchers can retrieve (Brügger 2018; Rawson 2013).

8. Counterevidence and scope: confidentiality, oral circulation, and public publication can all be true at once

The strongest counterevidence comes from the same 2003 Xinhua profile. The report recalls strict confidentiality around the 1983 operation and then describes oral circulation after Zhang returned to Changsha, where curiosity gathered around her workplace (Xinhua 2003a). The pair supports a refined historical claim: confidentiality describes the clinical disclosure regime; local visibility describes the social circulation regime. Each statement occupies its own evidentiary boundary.

A second boundary concerns authorship. Several reports describe Woman’s Dream as Zhang’s autobiography, while Changsha Evening News gives a detailed account of Deng Yingru’s authorship and Zhang’s contribution of experiences, previous manuscripts, and self-written material (Xinhua 2003b; Changsha Evening News 2003). The category “collaborative life writing” preserves both facts. Zhang’s self-narration remains central, and the book’s production history remains visible.

A third boundary concerns retrospective distance. The 2026 PUH3 article has institutional authority and unusually specific chronology, while it was produced forty-three years after the operation. The 2003 interviews stand roughly twenty years from the event and also carry the characteristics of recollection. Near-event records, participant memories, published life writing, and institutional retrospective each contribute different forms of evidence. The narrative-provenance ledger preserves these distances so that sources can corroborate one another while retaining distinct evidentiary layers.

A fourth boundary appears in current popular recirculation. Web search in 2026 surfaces several aggregation pages that package Zhang’s life as romance, celebrity intrigue, or melodramatic legend while continuing to reuse the “first” label. These pages are valuable evidence for how Zhang is being retold in 2026. Hospital sources, the 2003 press record, and formal institutional materials carry greater weight for the details of the 1983 event. Dividing sources by evidentiary function turns narrative drift into a separate object of study within the biography.

9. Original synthesis: the public-history relay and the shift in narrative agency

The materials from 1983 to 2003 can be arranged into at least seven relay stages:

This sequence is the public-history relay. Each stage uses materials inherited from earlier stages and adds new media conditions. The relay model treats public history as a process of accumulation and transfer. It also converts “public/private” from a binary label into a series of circulation layers.

The most consequential subject-level transition inside that relay is the shift in narrative agency. In 2003, Zhang connected earlier secrecy with experiences of coercive exposure and described publication as a form of release. Publication moved her biography from fragmented knowledge held by others into an attributed account whose timing and content involved her direct participation. Once public, the account entered a broader interpretive network of reporters, publishers, booksellers, readers, hospitals, and digital archives. Narrative agency therefore unfolds in two steps: a participant expands voluntary disclosure, and a public media system turns that disclosure into shared memory involving many actors.

The model also travels beyond one biography. National surveys turn dispersed individual experience into statistical evidence. Court judgments turn disputes into durable legal records. Hospital guides turn clinical pathways into institutional interfaces. Life writing turns personal memory into a public biography. The 2017 national survey, the 2018 legal-gender-recognition review, and later national health research expanded public transgender knowledge in China beyond the biographies of a small number of well-known individuals toward population, institutional, and service evidence (Beijing LGBT Center & Peking University 2017; UNDP 2018; Liu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2023). Zhang’s case fits into this longer evidence history as an early example of how an individual life acquired a durable public textual form.

10. Source practice: how to cite Zhang Kesha while preserving time and provenance

Researchers, journalists, editors, and agents can handle the Zhang Kesha record through four practices.

First, state both the event date and the record date. A precise formulation reads: “A 2026 PUH3 institutional retrospective records Zhang Kesha’s January 10, 1983 operation as China’s first male-to-female gender-reassignment surgery.” The sentence carries event_time=1983-01-10 and record_time=2026 together.

Second, mark the level of publicity. A formulation such as “A 2003 Xinhua interview records Zhang entering nationwide attributed publicity while also recalling earlier local oral circulation around her Changsha workplace” preserves voluntary national publicity and earlier local visibility in the same history.

Third, mark collaborative roles in life writing. A formulation such as “Woman’s Dream drew on Zhang’s experiences and accumulated narrative material, was written by Deng Yingru, and was published by Hunan Literature and Art Publishing House” keeps participant experience, authorship, and publishing infrastructure visible together (Changsha Evening News 2003).

Fourth, attach a source to superlatives. When the phrase “China’s first transgender person” appears, identify it as a historical label widely used in the 2003 book subtitle, headlines, and biographical packaging. When the claim concerns the medical event itself, pair that historical label with hospital and policy sources. Media framing and event verification then retain separate evidence paths.

A database can represent the record as:

{event_time, record_time, speaker, genre, audience, publicity_level, source_distance, retelling_risk, source_url}

The structure also supports search systems that must handle version differences. A query for “Zhang Kesha 1983 operation” can prioritize the hospital chronology and relatively early public interviews. A query for “Zhang Kesha public disclosure 2003” can prioritize publishing and book-signing reports. A query for “later memory of Zhang Kesha” can bring in the 2026 hospital history, specialist archives, and English-language recirculation. One name then connects several historical layers, while each layer retains its source responsibility.

Conclusion: public history emerges through a chain of recording relationships

Zhang Kesha’s 1983 operation began as a clinical event and quickly acquired local social visibility. Over the next two decades, private life, oral circulation, accumulated personal writing, and pressure around disclosure created the conditions for another documentary form. In 2003, Woman’s Dream, bookstore signings, and a concentrated cycle of press interviews converted those materials into an attributed, purchasable, quotable, and cross-regional public text. In 2026, PUH3 reorganized the same event from the perspective of physician and departmental history, while digital archives continued to preserve older reports and their metadata.

The public-history relay expresses the sequence as clinical event → local oral visibility → accumulation of private narrative → editorial collaboration → publication fixation → press-tour circulation → institutional retrospective and digital preservation. It explains how a clinically confidential case could carry earlier local visibility and why 2003 still marks a major transformation: Zhang participated at national scale in the narration of her own chronology, and publishing and journalism fixed that chronology into a shared public record.

The case also directs transgender-history editors toward a simple question: who produced each narrative, at which moment, and through which medium? Surgical dates, participant recollection, reporter organization, publishing markets, hospital history, and digital archives all contribute to a public biography. Separating and reconnecting these recording relationships brings a person back from a legendary label into a source-traceable historical subject, while revealing the concrete mechanisms through which transgender public memory developed in mainland China.

References

Academic and research sources

1. Chiang, Howard. 2012. “How China Became a ‘Castrated Civilization’ and Eunuchs a ‘Third Sex.’” Historical Reflections. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41289833
2. Chiang, Howard. 2018. After Eunuchs: Science, Medicine, and the Transformation of Sex in Modern China. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/after-eunuchs/9780231185783
3. Hickman, R. 2021. “What Is ‘Trans History’, Anyway?: Historiographical Theory and Practice in a Flourishing Field.” Midlands Historical Review. http://www.midlandshistoricalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/What-is-%E2%80%98trans-history-anyway_.pdf
4. Rawson, K. J. 2013. “Accessing Transgender // Desiring Queer(er?) Archival Logics.” Archivaria 68. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13234
5. Brügger, Niels. 2018. The Archived Web: Doing History in the Digital Age. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262537879/the-archived-web/
6. Bao, Hongwei. 2020. Queer China: Lesbian and Gay Literature and Visual Culture under Postsocialism. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Queer-China-Lesbian-and-Gay-Literature-and-Visual-Culture-under-Postsocialism/Bao/p/book/9780367819071
7. Bao, Hongwei. 2021. Queer Media in China. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Queer-Media-in-China/Bao/p/book/9781032010113
8. Engebretsen, Elisabeth L., William F. Schroeder, and Hongwei Bao, eds. 2015. Queer/Tongzhi China: New Perspectives on Research, Activism and Media Cultures. NIAS Press. https://cnlgbtdata.com/files/uploads/2024/06/Queer_Tongzhi_China.pdf
9. Liu, Sha. 2023. Performative Authenticity: Chinese Transgender People’s Digital Gender Practices. PhD thesis, London School of Economics. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/4608/
10. Liu, Ye, Ying Xin, Ji Qi, et al. 2020. “The Desire and Status of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Surgery in Transgender Men and Women in China: A National Population Study.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 17(11): 2291–2298. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32868262/
11. Chen, Runsen, Xuequan Zhu, et al. 2019. “Suicidal Ideation and Attempted Suicide Amongst Chinese Transgender Persons: National Population Study.” Journal of Affective Disorders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30699856/
12. Yan, Hongjing, Wenjing Xiao, Yunting Chen, et al. 2019. “High HIV Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors Among Transgender Women in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.” Journal of the International AIDS Society 22(11): e25417. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25417
13. Dahlkemper, J., B. Diaz, F. Lawanson, et al. 2019. Transgender Health Care in China. https://cnlgbtdata.com/files/uploads/2020/04/Transgender_Helathcare_in_China.pdf
14. Lin, T., Y. Cheng, T. L. Hughes, et al. 2022. “LGBTQ Health and Wellbeing in China: A Trend Analysis of English- and Chinese-Language Research, 2011–2018.” https://www.moderntreatise.com/s/LGBTQ-Health-and-Wellbeing-in-China-A-Trend-Analysis-of-English-and-Chinese-Language-Research-201120.pdf
15. Deng, Mingyu. 2016. “性别苦恼的临床研究新进展（DSM-5新标准）.” 中国健康心理学杂志. https://digital.transchinese.org/学术文献/医学/性别苦恼的临床研究新进展DSM-5_新标准.pdf
16. Coleman, Eli, Walter Bockting, Marsha Botzer, et al. 2012. “Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7.” International Journal of Transgenderism 13(4): 165–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.700873
17. Coleman, Eli, A. E. Radix, W. P. Bouman, et al. 2022. “Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8.” International Journal of Transgender Health 23(S1): S1–S259. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644
18. Hembree, Wylie C., Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis, Henriette A. Delemarre-van de Waal, et al. 2009. “Endocrine Treatment of Transsexual Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 94(9): 3132–3154. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19509099/
19. Hembree, Wylie C., Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis, Louis Gooren, et al. 2017. “Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 102(11): 3869–3903. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/102/11/3869/4157558
20. Reed, Geoffrey M., Michael B. First, Cary S. Kogan, et al. 2019. “Innovations and Changes in the ICD-11 Classification of Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.” World Psychiatry 18(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20611
21. Reisner, Sari L., Tonia Poteat, JoAnne Keatley, et al. 2016. “Global Health Burden and Needs of Transgender Populations: A Review.” The Lancet 388(10042): 412–436. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27323919/
22. Wang, Yuanyuan, et al. 2023. “A National Transgender Health Survey from China Assessing Gender Identity Conversion Practice, Mental Health, Substance Use and Suicidality.” Nature Mental Health. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-023-00041-z
23. Liu, Yunsheng, and Zhaojun Wu. 2018. “性别选择权：性质界定与法权塑造.” 东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）. https://digital.transchinese.org/学术文献/法律/性别选择权性质界定与法权塑造.pdf
24. Yang, Wenhui, Tianpei Hong, Xu Chang, et al. 2024. “The Efficacy of and User Satisfaction with Different Antiandrogens in Chinese Transgender Women.” International Journal of Transgender Health 25(3): 471–482. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39055628/

Primary, institutional, archival, and contemporaneous public sources

25. 邓映如. 2003. 女人梦：中国变性第一人. 湖南文艺出版社.
26. 新华社大连频道. 2003a. “对话中国第一变性人：渴望得到一份真感情(图).” 2003-04-14. https://news.sina.com.cn/s/2003-04-14/095392951s.shtml
27. 工人日报天讯在线／三湘都市报. 2003. “中国变性第一人：自言女人最重要的是婚姻.” 2003-06-05. https://news.sina.cn/sa/2003-06-05/detail-ikkntiak7411121.d.html
28. 新华社／今日早报. 2003b. “中国首个变性人要出自传：透视41年‘女人梦’.” 2003-06-08. https://news.sina.cn/sa/2003-06-08/detail-ikknscsi0576927.d.html
29. 长沙晚报. 2003. “‘中国变性第一人’的《女人梦》(组图).” 2003-06-17. https://news.sina.com.cn/s/2003-06-17/1117227541s.shtml
30. 南方都市报. 2003. “张克莎：我是变性人.” 2003-06-15. https://news.sohu.com/51/93/news210139351.shtml
31. 华商报. 2003. “中国第一变性人自白：我的现在比过去美丽(图).” 2003-06-21. https://news.sina.cn/sa/2003-06-21/detail-ikkntiak7458843.d.html
32. 扬子晚报. 2003. “‘变性第一人’来宁诉说‘女人梦’(图).” 2003-09-28. https://ent.sina.com.cn/2003-09-28/1325208135.html
33. 北医三院成形外科. 2012. “北医三院整形外科60年画册附录.” https://www.sar.com.cn/xinwen/syyydt/4132.html
34. 北医三院成形外科. 2026. “妙手换新颜 传承至美——纪念王大玫教授.” https://www.sar.com.cn/xinwen/syyydt/13337.html
35. 卫生部办公厅. 2009. “关于印发《变性手术技术管理规范（试行）》的通知（卫办医政发〔2009〕185号）.” https://www.nhc.gov.cn/zwgk/wtwj/201304/5a310ec69d264d4a890949d0b2fbcaf7.shtml
36. 国家卫生计生委办公厅. 2017. “关于印发造血干细胞移植技术管理规范（2017年版）等15个‘限制临床应用’医疗技术管理规范和质量控制指标的通知.” https://www.nhc.gov.cn/bgt/2016deqe/201707/cbf4a558b2b24354887f9825efbe3fb5/files/1745206490963_91523.pdf
37. 国家卫生健康委办公厅. 2022. “G05 性别重置技术临床应用管理规范（2022年版）.” https://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/c100068/202204/2655831f6f444b00b3e50604e67531f5/files/1733999790407_69971.pdf
38. 北医三院成形外科. 2018. “北医三院易性症序列医疗团队成立.” https://www.sar.com.cn/xinwen/news/12295.html
39. 北医三院成形外科. 2025. “北医三院易性症综合诊疗就诊指南.” https://www.puh3.net.cn/zxwk/info/1005/4211.htm
40. Beijing LGBT Center & Department of Sociology, Peking University. 2017. 2017中国跨性别群体生存现状调查报告：跨性别者与非性别常规者. https://cnlgbtdata.com/doc/43/
41. UNDP. 2018. Legal Gender Recognition in China: A Legal and Policy Review. https://www.undp.org/china/publications/legal-gender-recognition-china-legal-and-policy-review
42. Amnesty International. 2019. China: “I Need My Parents’ Consent to Be Myself”: Barriers to Gender-Affirming Treatments for Transgender People in China. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/0269/2019/en/
43. Project Trans. 2026. “中国大陆跨性别相关法律法规变迁.” https://project-trans.org/china-legal/
44. 跨性别新闻档案. 2026. “记者对话中国第一变性人：渴望一份真感情(图).” https://news.transchinese.org/搜狐新闻/news_记者对话中国第一变性人：渴望一份真感情_图__-新闻--搜狐/
45. 跨与多元性别档案. 2026. “北医三院易性症序列医疗团队.” https://digital.transchinese.org/社群及NGO文件/医院和医疗体系/北医三院易性症序列医疗团队_page/
46. Fridae. 2009. “China’s Health Ministry Announces Sex Change Surgery Guidelines.” 2009-06-18. https://www.fridae.asia/gay-news/2009/06/18/8475.china-s-health-ministry-announces-sex-change-surgery-guidelines
47. China Development Brief. 2017. “中国跨性别群体生存现状调查报告圆满发布.” https://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/news/detail/17772.html
48. Eastley, Bruce. 2023. China’s First Transgender: The Life and Times of Zhang Kesha. Writers Republic. https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/chinas-first-transgender-the-life-and-times-of-zhang-kesha/9798888108406.html