From Nanliang to Xiao Nanliang: How a Homophonic Place Name Became a Platform Label

Abstract

Nanliang (南梁) is first of all the conventional Chinese name of the Southern Liang dynasty. On Chinese platforms in the mid-2020s, however, the same two characters also became a playful near-homophone of nanniang (男娘), a contemporary label associated with feminine male presentation. The diminutive Xiao Nanliang (小南梁, “little Nanliang”) pushed the form further: public posts use it as a nickname, tutorial audience, series label, creator self-description, audience label, fictional-character cue, and searchable content tag. This case study follows repeated examples from 2024–2026 on Bilibili, AcFun, TapTap, Fanqie Novel, and LINUX DO and asks how a homophonic joke acquired enough repetition and functional range to become platform language.

The evidence supports a four-stage account: sound-and-form conversion, diminutive nicknaming, platform classification, and cross-community circulation. Independent creators repeatedly place Nanliang beside nanniang, cross-dressing, CD, and related tags; recurring “Nanliang training guide” titles turn the word into a series brand; Xiao Nanliang gives it an affectionate and character-like form; fiction and technical communities then reuse it outside the original video cluster. At the same time, creators continue to write nanniang and cross-dressing directly, Japanese creators continue to use terms such as 男の娘 and 女装, and English SFW communities continue to negotiate femboy as their own label. Nanliang therefore works best as a specifically Chinese platform-layer label that coexists with older vocabulary rather than replacing it.

Keywords: Nanliang; Xiao Nanliang; nanniang; cross-dressing; homophony; Bilibili; platform language; Chinese internet culture

1. Research question and central answer

This study asks three concrete questions. What linguistic actions does Nanliang perform in current public pages? How did Xiao Nanliang expand from a homophonic variation into a nickname, tutorial category, and content label? And what platform mechanisms helped the form travel beyond one creator or one site?

The central answer is a homophone → nickname → tag → classification chain. The sound resemblance between Nanliang and nanniang makes the historical-looking written form easy to connect with an already recognizable contemporary term. Adding xiao (“little”) makes the phrase more intimate, cute, and character-like. Creators then place the form in titles, collections, descriptions, and tags; repeated publication, search aggregation, comments, and recommendation interfaces make the same spelling reappear around related content. Once the term becomes a reusable discovery cue, it can be borrowed by fiction, game communities, and programmers.

Frequency alone does not prove a single community identity. The public record instead shows several actions: creators use the word about themselves, audiences use it about creators, tutorial authors address an imagined Xiao Nanliang reader, fiction uses it as a character or genre cue, and technical communities use it in occupational jokes. The practical research task is therefore to record speaker, object, placement, co-occurring labels, and platform action before deciding what a particular occurrence means.

2. Materials and method

The study uses a public-community-first sample. The main observation window looks at recent material while tracing verifiable examples backward through 2024–2026. A single account publishing ten videos counts as evidence of sustained use by one actor; independent accounts and movement between independent platforms carry more weight when deciding whether a form has become community-repeated or cross-platform language.

The Bilibili sample includes independent creators such as 美貌加载失败, 小琪_Official, 祭子SaiKO, 多彩世界の翼, 鱼汐小魔王, and 清聆盼燕. Cross-platform evidence comes from AcFun topic pages, a TapTap public post, Fanqie Novel pages, and LINUX DO discussions. Japanese note material and SFW discussions in r/feminineboys provide boundary cases for adjacent language environments rather than evidence that Nanliang itself has an international equivalent.

Academic work supplies the mechanism layer. Research on Bilibili shows how repeated danmu language, shared viewing, subtitles, and creator–audience interaction can build recognizable community forms (Wang 2022; Chen 2022). Research on vlogging, platform governance, and short-video visibility adds a second point: users do not simply coin a word and leave it in a sentence; they repeatedly place words in interface fields that organize discovery and participation (Zhang, Vázquez-Calvo, and Cassany 2023; Shang 2026). Work on platform societies and digital gender practice helps distinguish visible content classification from a person’s own identity claim (van Dijck, Poell, and de Waal 2018; Liu 2023).

The method therefore tracks five fields for each important occurrence: date, platform, speaker, labeled object, and communicative function. A title can prove creator-side naming; a self-description can support a self-label claim; a tag can show content adjacency; a comment can show audience language. None of those evidence types automatically substitutes for another.

3. A homophone connects a historical name to nanniang

Nanliang already has a stable written identity as a historical dynastic name. Online wordplay exploits its phonetic proximity to nanniang while keeping the visually ordinary characters 南梁. Once a page also contains nanniang, cross-dressing, “cute boy,” or similar cues, readers can recover the intended joke quickly. The written form gains memorability from being familiar in another domain, while the surrounding content supplies its new target.

A 2026 Bilibili creator page illustrates the layering clearly. 美貌加载失败 published a video titled roughly “From beginner cross-dressing to mastering nanniang,” while the accompanying self-description uses Nanliang and later items in the same content cluster use Xiao Nanliang for skincare, photography, and other tutorial-like topics. Direct labels such as nanniang and cross-dressing remain visible next to the homophonic form. The evidence therefore points to added stylistic and organizational work rather than a forced substitution of one spelling for another.

小琪_Official’s recurring “Nanliang training guide” gives the pattern even more structure. Episodes move through hair removal, weight loss, skincare, hair care, and related appearance practices. When one fixed prefix organizes a continuing series, the word starts telling viewers what kind of content to expect before they open a particular episode. This is platform classification in a practical sense: a nickname becomes a shelf label for a sequence of videos.

This coexistence also constrains a common explanation that treats Nanliang purely as moderation evasion. Platform governance can influence spelling and euphemism in general (Shang 2026), but several sampled pages display Nanliang and nanniang side by side. In those cases, playful style, branding, cuteness, and discovery provide more direct explanations than concealment alone. A moderation-evasion claim for a specific item would require additional evidence such as deletion history, creator testimony, or an applicable platform rule.

4. Xiao Nanliang turns the joke into a person-like role

The diminutive xiao changes what the form can do. Chinese online nicknames frequently use “little + noun” to create intimacy, cuteness, lightness, or a character-like role. Xiao Nanliang can therefore address a reader, describe a video subject, mark a romantic interest, or serve as a creator’s self-presentation without requiring every use to carry the same identity meaning.

The sampled pages distribute those actions across independent actors. 小琪_Official asks whether a viewer has the “talent” to become a Xiao Nanliang, turning the phrase into a learnable role. 鱼汐小魔王 asks how one might find a Xiao Nanliang as a partner, moving it into relationship talk. 多彩世界の翼 uses the phrase for a person taking a mirror selfie in a school-uniform-style outfit. 清聆盼燕 uses Xiao Nanliang in a self-description connected with a “Nanliang roommate” work. These pages together establish community repetition because they do more than repeat the same creator’s catchphrase.

Nearby spelling play reinforces the point. A Bilibili title using 小南娘 keeps the first character of Nanliang while replacing 梁 with 娘, moving visually closer to nanniang. Such variants show that participants continue manipulating the written form. Co-occurring platform labels stabilize the content cluster even when the exact spelling is flexible.

This flexibility is why a glossary-only definition would be too narrow. Xiao Nanliang is useful precisely because it can be a nickname in one page, a tutorial audience in another, and a fictional-character cue elsewhere. The stable object is not one universal identity category; it is a recognizable platform expression with a growing distribution of functions.

5. Series names and tags give the term discovery power

Platform language becomes durable when creators can place it repeatedly in high-visibility interface positions. Titles, tags, collections, descriptions, and comments all provide such positions. Research on danmu emphasizes the role of repetition and ritualized language in producing a sense of shared participation (Wang 2022). Research on Bilibili content governance and user-generated discourse similarly shows that platform affordances shape how language is circulated and recognized (Nakahara and Cai 2026; Shang 2026).

The recurring “Nanliang training guide” is the clearest series-level example. A shared prefix links separate pieces of practical advice, helping viewers infer continuity. 祭子SaiKO uses Nanliang and Xiao Nanliang in survey-like and comedic titles. Tags around these pages place the expressions beside nanniang, CD, cross-dressing, TS, MTF, and other labels. Such co-occurrence is best read as an adjacency graph: creators or platforms place terms around related content, but each term’s social action still needs contextual interpretation.

This distinction matters for search and recommendation systems. A retrieval system can reasonably connect Nanliang with nanniang-related content because public pages repeatedly place them together. A knowledge base should preserve more structure: whether the source was a title, a creator bio, a platform tag, or an audience comment. Search linkage and identity classification are different operations.

6. Cross-platform movement expands the semantic radius

The term’s next stage appears when it leaves the dense Bilibili cluster. A TapTap post combines Xiao Nanliang with a nanniang hashtag. AcFun topic pages place Nanliang and nanniang around cross-dressing content. Fanqie Novel titles and keyword pages use Nanliang as a character or premise cue. LINUX DO discussions fold the term into a programmer stereotype in which anime avatars, Nanliang presentation, and technical ability become ingredients of an in-group joke.

These examples matter because they come from platforms with different dominant content forms. Video tutorials, game-community posts, serialized fiction, and programmer forums do not share one interface or one audience. Repetition across them therefore strengthens the claim that Nanliang has become portable community language rather than remaining the brand of one video creator.

Cross-platform movement can also change meaning. A tutorial series invites readers to learn techniques; a novel title uses the word to forecast a character or plot; a technical-community joke recruits it into an occupational stereotype. Platform research suggests that such transformations are expected when the same cultural resource enters different visibility and participation systems (van Dijck, Poell, and de Waal 2018; Mao, Lin, and Wang 2024).

7. The technical-community turn: from appearance label to programmer joke

The LINUX DO examples are particularly useful because they show a circle in which feminine presentation is not the only salient topic. Posts connect Nanliang with programmers, anime avatars, and coding ability. The joke can be summarized as a stylized claim that an anime-looking or Nanliang-coded programmer may also be a technical expert. That relationship foreshadows the separate “Turing faction” meme studied later by GenderLibs.

This occupational use expands the term’s semantic radius without erasing its earlier associations. Readers still recover the nanniang/cross-dressing connection, but the immediate linguistic action may be technical praise or programmer self-mockery. A translation that replaces Nanliang with femboy would preserve some appearance information while losing the homophonic Chinese wordplay and the platform-specific occupational joke.

Digital identity research provides a useful caution. Online self-presentation emerges through interactions among profile fields, audience interpretation, platform affordances, and personal choices (Liu 2023). A technical-community joke about a member therefore supports a claim about community language, not automatically a claim about that member’s gender identity.

8. Japanese and English boundary samples

Japanese and English comparison material helps identify what is specifically Chinese about Nanliang. Recent Japanese creator posts continue to use 男の娘 and 女装 in ordinary discussions of makeup, cosplay, clothing, and self-presentation. SFW r/feminineboys discussions continue to negotiate femboy as an English community label connected with appearance, relationships, sexuality, and self-description. Those terms have their own histories and speaker relations (Kinsella 2020a; Ho 2021).

Nanliang does not need a one-word equivalent in either language. When translating a Chinese page, the safest first occurrence can retain Nanliang and add a short explanation such as “a Chinese-platform homophonic nickname associated with nanniang and feminine-male or cross-dressing content.” Later sentences can describe the concrete action: creator self-description, tutorial label, audience nickname, fiction cue, or programmer joke.

That strategy preserves what is distinctive about the source. Rendering Nanliang directly as otokonoko would suggest a Japanese role/history; rendering it directly as femboy would suggest an English community label and could turn an audience joke into a self-description. Cross-language work should carry the original platform action into the explanation instead of searching for a permanent one-to-one substitute (Baldo, Evans, and Guo 2021).

9. Competing explanations and what the evidence supports

Three explanations are worth testing against the sample. The first treats Nanliang as pure moderation evasion. Moderation and governance can affect platform language, but public pages that display Nanliang and nanniang simultaneously give more direct support to wordplay, nickname, brand, and retrieval functions. The evasion explanation remains possible in individual contexts when direct evidence appears.

The second treats Nanliang as an accidental one-off pun. Independent creators, recurring series, several years of videos, fiction pages, game-community posts, and technical discussion now form a repetition chain. An accidental homophone can explain the initial form; it does not by itself explain serial branding and cross-platform reuse.

The third treats Nanliang as a single standardized identity name. The public sample instead distributes it across self-description, other-description, tutorials, fiction, tags, and jokes. Research on Chinese digital gender practice and earlier Chinese internet gender vocabulary likewise shows that speaker relations and public framing matter to interpretation (Liu 2023; 方亭 2011; 高庆 2012; 刘艳茹、石美玉 2013). Functional distribution is therefore a better description of the present evidence than a universal identity definition.

10. Original synthesis: four conversions in the current life history

The evidence can be summarized as four conversions. First, sound-and-form conversion links a familiar historical spelling to nanniang through phonetic resemblance. Second, nickname conversion adds Xiao, making the form suitable for affectionate address, tutorial audiences, and character-like labels. Third, platform-classification conversion places the word in recurring titles, tags, and collections, turning it into a discovery cue. Fourth, cross-community conversion moves the expression into game communities, fiction, and programmer humor.

Together these stages describe platform lexicalization. This model does not require a single inventor. The public web is much better at documenting repetition, co-occurrence, serial use, and movement between communities than at proving the first private utterance of a joke. Earlier archive discoveries can revise the start of the chronology while leaving the 2024–2026 diffusion evidence intact.

For future community-language monitoring, the same model provides a practical threshold. A new form begins as a single-point observation. Independent repetition raises confidence that a community pattern exists. Movement between independent platforms raises it again. Publication becomes useful when the research can also describe competing interpretations, speaker roles, and relationships to older vocabulary.

11. Editorial, research, and agent use

When encountering Nanliang, first preserve the original spelling, URL, date, and placement. A title, tag, creator bio, and comment are different evidence. Second, record neighboring terms such as nanniang, cross-dressing, CD, MTF, or “cute boy.” Third, record who is speaking. Creator self-description supports one kind of claim; an audience label supports another; a fiction tag supports a content-classification claim.

Fourth, track time and cross-platform state. Repeated independent use and movement between sites are stronger signals than one viral post. Finally, translate the action. A creator calling themselves Xiao Nanliang can be described as self-labeling; a tutorial may address “Xiao Nanliang” readers; a programmer forum may be making an occupational joke. This preserves more information than forcing all occurrences into one English noun.

Conclusion

Public material from 2024–2026 shows Nanliang and Xiao Nanliang becoming stable pieces of Chinese platform language. The process begins with a near-homophone of nanniang, gains an affectionate diminutive, becomes repeatable through titles and series names, acquires discovery power through tags and co-occurrence, and then travels into AcFun, TapTap, web fiction, and technical communities.

The most important finding is functional diversity. Nanliang can be a self-label, audience label, tutorial subject, series brand, fiction cue, content tag, or in-group joke; Xiao Nanliang often adds intimacy and character-like cuteness. Japanese 男の娘 / 女装 and English femboy continue to operate through their own community histories, which makes Nanliang’s Chinese platform specificity more visible.

Ongoing observation should therefore focus on earlier verifiable examples, changes in co-occurrence with nanniang/cross-dressing/CD, and shifts in who uses the term and for what action. Continuous public sampling can turn small changes in community language into a citable history without mistaking one popular post for a settled definition.

References

Academic sources

1. Wang, Rui. 2022. “Community-Building on Bilibili: The Social Impact of Danmu Comments.” Media and Communication 10 (2): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.4996
2. Chen, Xijinyan. 2022. “Taboo Language in Non-Professional Subtitling on Bilibili.com: A Corpus-Based Study.” Languages 7 (2): 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020138
3. Zhang, Leticia-Tian, Boris Vázquez-Calvo, and Daniel Cassany. 2023. “The Emerging Phenomenon of L2 Vlogging on Bilibili: Characteristics, Engagement, and Informal Language Learning.” Profesional de la información 32 (3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.01
4. Gao, Yichang, Fengming Liu, and Lei Gao. 2023. “Echo Chamber Effects on Short Video Platforms.” Scientific Reports 13: 6282. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33370-1
5. Shang, Zheyu. 2026. “Shifting Platform Governance: Examining Participatory Content Moderation on a Chinese Platform Bilibili.” Information, Communication & Society 29 (2): 492–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2520004
6. Nakahara, Junki, and Jing Cai. 2026. “User-Generated ‘Feminism’ on BiliBili: Nationalism, Internet Culture, and Platform Dynamics in Digital China.” New Media & Society 28 (5). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251317176
7. Mao, Yifei, Zhong Lin, and Feng Wang. 2024. “Making Sense of Trans-Translating in Blogger Subtitling: A Netnographic Approach to Translanguaging on a Chinese Microblogging Site.” Applied Linguistics Review 15 (2): 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0016
8. Liu, Shan. 2023. Performative Authenticity: Chinese Transgender People’s Digital Gender Practices. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/4608/
9. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
10. 方亭. 2011.「从动漫流行语解读中国青年亚文化的心理症候——以‘萝莉’‘伪娘’‘宅男／宅女’为例」《中国青年研究》第1期：78–81、70。
11. 高庆. 2012.「被集体围观的小众：‘伪娘’的个性表达与社会纠结」《中国青年研究》第9期：79–84、30。
12. 刘艳茹、石美玉. 2013.「语言‘伪娘’化的社会语言学考察」《社会科学战线》第8期：158–161。
13. Baldo, Michela, Jonathan Evans, and Ting Guo. 2021. “Introduction: Translation and LGBT+/Queer Activism.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 16 (2): 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.00051.int
14. Kinsella, Sharon. 2020a. “Cuteness, Josō, and the Need to Appeal: Otoko no Ko in Male Subculture in 2010s Japan.” Japan Forum 32 (3): 432–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2019.1676289
15. Kinsella, Sharon. 2020b. “Otoko no Ko Manga and New Wave Crossdressing in the 2000s: A Two-Dimensional to Three-Dimensional Male Subculture.” Mechademia: Second Arc 13 (1): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.5749/mech.13.1.0040
16. Ho, Michelle H. S. 2021. “From Dansō to Genderless: Mediating Queer Styles and Androgynous Bodies in Japan.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 22 (2): 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2021.1927555
17. Glasspool, Lucy. 2023. “Engagements with Gender, Sexuality, and Authenticity in Cosplay.” In Gender in Japanese Popular Culture: Rethinking Masculinities and Femininities, 239–264. Palgrave Macmillan. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62966
18. King, Emerald L. 2023. “Creating the Body Beautiful Cosplay: Crossdressing, Cosplay, and Hyper Femininity/Hyper Masculinity.” In Gender in Japanese Popular Culture: Rethinking Masculinities and Femininities, 205–237. Palgrave Macmillan. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62966
19. Galbraith, Patrick W. 2019. Otaku and the Struggle for Imagination in Japan. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007012
20. Steinberg, Marc. 2012. Anime’s Media Mix: Franchising Toys and Characters in Japan. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816675494.001.0001
21. Winge, Theresa. 2006. “Costuming the Imagination: Origins of Anime and Manga Cosplay.” Mechademia 1: 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/mec.0.0084

Community, creator, platform, and archive sources

22. 美貌加载失败. 2026.「从女装入门到男娘精通：第一期」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1V59mBoE2t/
23. 小琪_Official. 2025a.「如何判断你有没有当小南梁的天赋」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1jAYVzeEqM/
24. 小琪_Official. 2025b.「〖南梁养成攻略〗脱毛篇」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV11gYjzxEdz/
25. 小琪_Official. 2025c.「〖南梁养成攻略〗整体减肥篇」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1gqHJzLE3Y/
26. 小琪_Official. 2025d.「〖南梁养成攻略〗护肤基础篇」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1w6H3z3ELn/
27. 祭子SaiKO. 2025a.「南梁大调查：小南梁出门会被歧视嘛？」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1KNabzsER4/
28. 祭子SaiKO. 2025b.「小南梁 的现代三角贸易（」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1H9xYz1Eii/
29. 多彩世界の翼. 2026.「小南梁对着镜子穿上女装JK自拍。」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1qKfcB5EWA/
30. 鱼汐小魔王. 2025.「怎样才能找到小南梁当对象？」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV17SgTzbEwU/
31. 清聆盼燕. 2024.「《我的南梁室友》」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1V1421S7w3/
32. 无敌一一酱. 2025.「太善良，人善变人妻就变成小南梁了 555」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1cDamziEVF/
33. 喵九酱sama. 2025.「教你如何鉴别小南娘！」Bilibili. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1GbjEzPE3H/
34. 默念魔女. 2025.「感谢和平精英，让我变成小南梁#男娘」TapTap. https://www.taptap.cn/moment/655392575330452567
35. AcFun. 2025.「〖南梁〗话题」公开社区页面. https://preonline.m.acfun.cn/communityCircle/604425
36. AcFun. 2026.「〖女装〗话题」公开社区页面，含“南梁牛逼”与“男娘”标签. https://preonline.m.acfun.cn/communityCircle/1765
37. 窝窝头鸭. 2024.《可爱南梁，被迫女装》番茄小说. https://fanqienovel.com/page/7370415442373921854
38. 窝窝头鸭. 2024.《我才不要当男娘啊！！！！！！！》番茄小说. https://fanqienovel.com/page/7399526947430075417
39. 土豆不是地豆. 2026.《家有癫妹？不要逼哥哥女装呀！》番茄小说. https://fanqienovel.com/page/7489307198061808664
40. 倦眼问酒书. 2026.《先天南梁圣体，校花别让我女装了》番茄小说. https://fanqienovel.com/keyword/7534864447177771043
41. LINUX DO. 2026.「女装才是代码大神的终极方向吗」公开讨论. https://linux.do/t/topic/1518801
42. LINUX DO. 2025.「七夕了不知道跟谁过」公开讨论，第4页. https://linux.do/t/topic/915215?page=4
43. mondeberry. 2026.「〖2026.7.10版〗初心者男の娘が女装コスプレをするときのメイクと道具」note. https://note.com/mondeberry/n/n72dd6a90808a
44. Reddit r/feminineboys. 2026. “Ok femboys, big question.” https://www.reddit.com/r/feminineboys/comments/1unqm9k/
45. Reddit r/feminineboys. 2026. “Are femboys really LGBTQIA2S+?” https://www.reddit.com/r/feminineboys/comments/1tdhyvt/
46. Wiktionary contributors. 2026. “南梁.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%8D%97%E6%A2%81